|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
Singapore's policy keeps drugs at bay Michael Teo Today Friday 11 Jun 2010 That is why many governments are focused on tackling addiction, preventing drug-related crimes and ultimately protecting their populations. Singapore's tough stand and use of strict laws and stiff penalties against those involved in the drug trade, including capital punishment, have sometimes come under criticism. The comment by Mr Patrick Gallahue and Mr Rick Lines of the International Harm Reduction Association (IHRA) prompted by the trial of a drug trafficker Yong Vui Kong and the imposition of the death penalty on him is a recent instance. Singapore pursues a comprehensive national strategy to combat the scourge of drugs, comprising a high-profile public education campaign, treatment and rehabilitation of drug offenders, as well as strict laws and stiff penalties against those involved in the drug trade. Public education against drug abuse starts in schools. For abusers, our approach is to try hard to wean them off drugs and deter them from relapsing. They are given two chances in a drug rehabilitation centre. If they go through counselling, kick their drug habit and return to society with useful skills, they will not have any criminal record. Those who are still addicted go to prison, where they are put on general rehabilitation programmes to help them reintegrate into the community. Strong community support against drug abuse has been critical to our fight against drugs. Singapore society resolutely rejects drug abuse. Several voluntary welfare organisations run halfway houses to help recovering addicts adjust back into society. Many employers also come forward to offer reformed drug addicts employment opportunities. Drug traffickers are a major part of the problem on the supply side. They make drugs available in our communities and profit from the human misery they help create. This is why tough laws and penalties are needed, including capital punishment for trafficking in significant amounts of the most harmful drugs. This sends a strong deterrent signal to would-be traffickers. But unfortunately, attracted by the lucrative payoffs, some still traffic in drugs knowing full well the penalty if they get caught. With all these efforts, Singapore has one of the lowest prevalence of drug abuse worldwide, even though it has not been entirely eliminated. Over two decades, the number of drug abusers arrested each year has declined by two-thirds, from over 6,000 in the early '90s to about 2,000 last year. Fewer than two in 10 abusers released from prison or drug rehabilitation centres relapse within two years. We do not have traffickers pushing drugs openly in the streets, nor do we need to run needle exchange centres. Because of our strict laws, Singapore does not have to contend with major drug syndicates linked to organised crime, unlike some other countries. According to the 2008 World Drug Report by the United Nations office on drugs and crime 8.2 per cent of the United Kingdom's population are cannabis abusers; in Singapore it is 0.005 per cent. For ecstasy, the figures are 1.8 per cent for the UK and 0.003 per cent for Singapore; and for opiates - such as heroin, opium and morphine - 0.9 per cent for the UK and 0.005 per cent for Singapore. Singapore's use of capital punishment has come under criticism. However, contrary to the assertions of anti-death penalty campaigners like Gallahue and Lines, Singapore laws that specify the death penalty for certain drug offences do not contravene international law. Notably, at the United Nations general assembly in 2008, 46 countries, including some of the world's largest democracies, voted against a draft resolution proposing a moratorium on the death penalty. Another 34 countries abstained. In the recent case of Yong Vui Kong, the court of appeal acknowledged that the mandatory death penalty is constitutional, and the high court expressly found that Yong Vui Kong knew he was carrying the drugs. Every society strikes its own balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of society. Capital punishment is an integral part of our successful comprehensive anti-drug strategy. Our tough stance against drugs has saved tens of thousands of lives from the drug menace. It is therefore not surprising that the majority of Singaporeans continue to support the death penalty. Michael Teo is Singapore's High Commissioner to the Court of St James'. All Ambassadors and High Commissioners to the United Kingdom are accredited to and received at the Court of St James'. The writer is concurrently accredited as Ambassador to Ireland. This commentary first appeared in the "comment is free" section on guardian.co.uk on June 5. http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC100611-0000105/Singapores-policy-keeps-drugs-at-bay
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!