Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Mr Cannabis and the case of planted evidence

The Times

Tuesday 04 Aug 1998



Mr Cannabis and the case of planted evidence st2077.htm


Subj: Mr Cannabis and the case of planted evidence

Date: Aug 4, 1998

Source: The Times


AUTHOR: JOANNA BALE

Mr Cannabis and the case of planted evidence

A MAN who changed his name to Free R Cannabis was convicted yesterday of
possessing the drug after trying to present a marijuana plant to the Home
Secretary.

Cannabis, 30, formerly Robert Christopher, walked free from courtafter being
given a conditional discharge. The hemp shop owner was arrested as he
brandished the plant during a demonstration outside the Home Office by
supporters of the legalisation of cannabis. Dressed in a hemp collar and
tie, Cannabis, who conducted his own defence, told Southwark Crown Court
that he planned the protest after being jailed for refusing to pay a £100
fine for possession of 1 1/2 g of cannabis.

Cannabis, of Glastonbury, Somerset, explained that he had challenged Jack
Straw to a live television debate on the benefits and uses of cannabis in
medicine, fuel and clothing. Mr Straw had not replied, so he had gone to the
Home Office in February with the intention of presenting the Home Secretary
with a cannabis plant.

Although Cannabis admitted that the plant was his, he pleaded not guilty to
possession of a Class B drug. He told the court that he wanted to challenge
the law because he believes that cannabis is not a drug. He said: "This is
deliberate misinformation put out by the Government to support the
deliberate oppression of civil rights." He claimed that there is
considerable scientific evidence to show that cannabis is a "safe, harmless,
benign, health-promoting herb".

After a unanimous guilty verdict, Judge Bathurst Norman conditionally
discharged him for 12 months, telling him that he had clearly been making a
"political gesture". Cannabis, who will appeal against conviction, was
ordered to pay £100 towards prosecution costs.








 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!