Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: The drugs questions that won't go away

Tania Branigan and Julian Glover

The Guardian

Saturday 15 Oct 2005

---
- Davis says any recent use must disqualify candidate
- Cameron faces growing pressure as ballot nears

David Cameron faced growing pressure last night to answer questions over
whether he has a history of drug use after rival Conservative leadership
contender David Davis suggested that anyone who has recently taken hard
drugs could not lead the party. In a pre-recorded interview for tonight's
Morgan and Platell programme on Channel 4, Mr Davis was asked whether
someone who had taken class A drugs could lead the party or the country. He
said: "Well, it's a breach of the law, so if it was recent, the answer
would be no."

His remarks intensified the pressure on Mr Cameron in the run-up to next
week's first round leadership ballot in which he is expected to emerge as
one of a shortlist of three. The strain on him and his supporters has grown
during the week, with Mr Cameron finding it increasingly difficult to stick
to his refusal to talk about his past and private life in the face of
pointed questions about the use of hard drugs.

Mr Cameron's team say his approach is "dignified" and parliamentary backing
appears solid, with supportive MPs applauding his decision not to change
tack under media pressure. But other camps suggest that his refusal to
elaborate is an error of judgment that raises questions about his
competence as a leader.

Supporters admit they did not expect the story to persist as it has, but
argue that changing strategy now would only make the position worse. A full
and frank account of what he has, or has not, done in the past might look
like panic at this stage. It might also encourage the press to declare open
season.

The issue first surfaced at a conference fringe event when Mr Cameron was
asked if he had taken drugs. He replied: "I had a normal university
experience." Pressed by the Observer columnist Andrew Rawnsley, he added:
"There were things I did as a student that I don't think I should talk
about now that I am a politician."

His reply was regarded as an admission of adolescent cannabis use. But
within days the rumours escalated, as he refused to elaborate under
repeated questioning from interviewers.

On Thursday, asked specifically if he had ever taken a class A drug, he
told BBC1's Question Time: "We're both allowed to have had a private life
before politics in which we make mistakes and we do things that we should
not and we are all human and we err and stray."

An aide said yesterday."There are people like Edward Leigh [a rightwing
senior backbencher] who say he should talk about this. They are entitled to
their views, but we think they are completely wrong."

The absence of a denial has allowed rivals and the press to inflate the
rumours without offering any evidence. Mr Cameron's supporters pin most of
the blame on Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Mail on Sunday -
rumoured to be publishing a negative story tomorrow - and the London
Evening Standard, which revealed yesterday that a close relative of the
shadow education secretary had been addicted to heroin.

In a statement, Mr Cameron said he was "incredibly proud" that the person
had overcome a drug problem, adding: "Many families will have had a similar
experience, and they and I know full well the damage drugs can do. I hope
now that this person can be left alone."

Mr Cameron leaped into second place in the contest, with 34 declared
supporters, thanks to barnstorming speeches at his campaign launch and the
party conference. That suggests Ken Clarke (with 23 declared supporters)
and Liam Fox (who has 20) will challenge each other for third place in
Tuesday's ballot of the parliamentary party. David Davis has a clear lead
with 67 declared supporters.

All would be happy to see the young pretender falter. While they have
denied using drugs themselves, their campaign teams have been careful not
to press the issue of Mr Cameron's past. In truth they do not need to
pursue the matter when the media are doing so assiduously.

Earlier this week at a meeting of the rightwing 92 Group of MPs, Mark
Pritchard, a Davis supporter, asked Mr Clarke whether he had used hard
drugs. The former chancellor replied that he had not taken cocaine. The
query appeared to anger many present and was not repeated to Mr Cameron.
But on Thursday, when the Contact Group of Tory wives ran out of time to
question Mr Clarke, he joked: "I haven't taken cocaine, if that's what you
were going to ask."

"Ken is the person who has twice used the word 'cocaine' ... He is playing
the hardest ball on this and you can see why," said a supporter of another
candidate.

Mr Cameron cannot be accused of hypocrisy: he has advocated the reform of
drug laws since his arrival in parliament four years ago. Serving on the
home affairs select committee in 2001, he supported the reclassification of
cannabis and ecstasy.

In a diary for the Guardian Unlimited website at the time he wrote: "I am
an instinctive libertarian who abhors state prohibitions and tends to be
sceptical of most government action, whether targeted against drug use or
anything else ... Hounding hundreds of thousands - indeed millions - of
young people with harsh criminal penalties is no longer practicable or
desirable."

David Blunkett, then the home secretary, praised Mr Cameron's open mind on
the subject, telling MPs: "These are difficult and sometimes dangerous
questions to deal with in politics."

As he waits for tomorrow's newspapers, Mr Cameron would no doubt agree.

Highs and lows

Tuesday October 4 David Cameron cheered at Blackpool after an impressive
speech promising to take the Tories on "an incredible journey".

Wednesday 5 David Davis falters after an adequate but uninspiring speech.
Suddenly Cameron looks like a challenger for the Tory crown. That night the
Observer's Andrew Rawnsley questions Cameron about past drug use. He shrugs
off the question - but does not deny it.

Sunday 9 Cameron refuses to confirm or deny past drug use on the BBC's
Sunday AM programme.

Monday 11 As Malcolm Rifkind pulls out of the race, Cameron picks up new
support and a poll shows him ahead with party members.

Wednesday 12 Cameron joins other candidates at hustings. Ken Clarke denies
taking cocaine but Cameron is not questioned on the issue.

Thursday 13 Cameron is pressed on Question Time over whether he has used
class A drugs; he does not give a specific answer.

Yesterday The Daily Mail runs a full-page editorial calling on Cameron to
come clean as the London Evening Standard reports past drug addiction of a
close family member.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!