Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Confused about cannabis?

Amy Iggulden

The Telegraph

Friday 06 Jan 2006

---
As ministers equivocate, Amy Iggulden tries to find some answers

It seems that Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, is as confused about
cannabis as the rest of us. Earlier this week, he admitted that the
Government may have misled the public about its dangers when, two years
ago, the drug was downgraded from class B to class C.

A quarter of the calls made last year to Talk to Frank, the
government-backed drugs helpline, were about cannabis. But just how
confused are the rest of us, and how worried should we be?

Here, a cannabis user who believes the drug contributed to his
breakdown, a campaigner, a medical expert and parent share their
knowledge and fears.

The expert
Dr Zerrin Atakan, lead consultant psychiatrist at the National Psychosis
Unit at Bethlem Royal Hospital, Kent

"Every day I see the results of confusion about cannabis, and I worry
that there is a misguided perception among young people that it is
harmless. This is simply not the case. Studies show that cannabis use in
under-18s can be harmful to the brain, which continues to develop
through teenage years.

"Research also suggests that early smokers of cannabis are among the
most at-risk groups. I see people who smoke regularly from the age of
12. In those who are genetically predisposed to psychotic conditions
such as schizophrenia, early smoking of the drug can increase the risk
of psychosis later in life by three to six times.

"Even though this happens in a minority of people, cannabis use seems to
induce problems where before there were none.

"It is important to remember that these numbers are small, but parents
should also be aware that some varieties of cannabis, particularly skunk
and cheese, contain much higher levels of tetrahydrocannabinol [THC],
the active chemical.

"Much of this information was available when the drug was declassified
in 2004, so I find it hard to understand why the Government seems to be
making a U-turn.

"I don't believe upgrading the drug will make a great deal of
difference, but we need to make people much more aware of the risks."

The user
Peter, 27, used to smoke cannabis heavily; he now works with people
suffering from mental health problems

"I used to smoke from the moment I woke up until I went to bed. I was
like a walking cannabis joint; all my friends were made through smoking.

"When I moved on to high-strength skunk, it gave me some really crazy
ideas, until finally I was sectioned [in a mental ward] when I was 21.
It would probably have happened anyway, but I really believe that the
drug speeded the process up.

"The problem is that you don't know how it is going to affect you. One
night you might have a quick smoke, and feel a bit calm, but you can
easily smoke something else two days later that leaves you stuck to the
sofa until the next morning. That's the danger: there is no way of
knowing how it is going to hit you.

"I was OK in the end, because, even though I avoided people for a year
after I went a bit crazy - even my family - I came out of it. I still
smoke a bit now, but nothing like before.

"One of my best friends smoked from 15 and committed suicide in his
twenties. I know that skunk - as well as other drugs - was a major
thing, because it completely de-socialised him. He drifted away and
didn't come back.

"The risks about cannabis should be advertised in the same way as
smoking - then at least we will know what we might be getting into."

The campaigner
Paul Corry, director of campaigns at Rethink, the largest severe mental
illness charity in the UK

"The Government has simply failed to stay abreast of changes in the
development of cannabis. Through the 4,000 help services we run in
England and Wales, we regularly hear how little people know about its
true effects.

"In the early 1970s, when about a million people smoked it regularly, it
was seen as risk-free, but the three million people who smoke it now are
more likely to be smoking super-strength cannabis.

"Parents who grew up in the days when cannabis was viewed lightly need
to be aware that even light consumption can be risky for certain people."

The parent
Anne, 55, a teacher and mother of two sons in their twenties who
regularly smoke cannabis

"Until a year ago, I did not worry about the effects of cannabis,
because when I was a student in the 1960s it seemed to be fairly
harmless - even though it was illegal.

"The situation seems so much cloudier now. My two sons are regular
social smokers, and although I know that cannabis has become much
stronger, I haven't been deeply concerned about them so far - mainly
because I don't think they have a predisposition to mental health problems.

"I was also fairly unworried because the attitude taken by the
Government seemed to be relaxed.

"Since it was declassified, though, I hear more and more about the
health effects and I am concerned that no one seems to know what impact
cannabis could have on things like fertility, cancer and memory - let
alone the mental health risks.

"As my boys are adults, I can't do anything about them smoking it, but I
wish they wouldn't, and I wish the Government would give a clearer idea
of any known links between cannabis and mental health problems.

"There is so much ambiguity surrounding the issue that I feel I can only
trust my own instinct."

- Some names have been changed

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!