Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: About-turn on cannabis 'would cause confusion'

The Telegraph

Monday 09 Jan 2006

---
Reclassifying cannabis for the second time in under three years would
cause fresh confusion, campaigners said yesterday.

Charles Clarke, the Home Secretary, is considering a report from the
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs on whether medical evidence
linking the drug to mental disorders warrants a change of policy.

Someone smoking cannabis
Cannabis was reduced from a Class B to a Class C substance in 2003

It is thought that the council has not recommended reclassifying
cannabis, which was reduced from a Class B to a Class C substance in 2003.

However, it does believe in the need for a more robust education
campaign against its use, something the Government intends to follow up.

Mr Clarke, who is due to announce this month whether he will reverse the
decision of his predecessor David Blunkett, said the indications that
cannabis use could lead to, or worsen, schizophrenia was "very concerning".

He told BBC radio: "Since that decision, further medical evidence has
been developed about the implications of consumption of cannabis on
mental health, which is serious."

He conceded that downgrading cannabis had left people confused about the
potential impact of the consumption of the drug and said it was
significant that many supporters of a more liberal regime had changed
their minds in the light of the new medical evidence.

However, drugs campaigners urged Mr Clarke to retain the current
classification, on the grounds that it reflected the relative harm of
the drug compared with heroin or crack cocaine.

Martin Barnes, the chief executive of DrugScope, who sits on the
council, said: "There are encouraging signs that, since
reclassification, the level of use has fallen among young people."

Mark Oaten, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said the
Government should not restore more serious penalties for cannabis unless
there was "strong evidence" to back such a move.

Dame Ruth Runciman, who was chairman of the Police Foundation inquiry
that recommended downgrading cannabis five years ago, said the
reclassification had been "very badly handled" and had created much
misunderstanding.

"To reclassify is as ill-judged as it can be in my view," she said. "It
will add greatly to the confusion."

Although the classification of cannabis was changed, the drug remains
illegal and dealing in it can attract a prison term of 14 years. Users
face up to two years in jail.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!