Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: How Lambeth was used to test 'softly softly' scheme

Maxine Frith

The Independent

Thursday 19 Jan 2006

---
The south London borough of Lambeth has become the nation's guinea pig
in the debate over whether a zero-tolerance or a softer approach works
best in dealing with the cannabis issue.

In 2001 Brian Paddick, who was the local police commander, introduced an
experiment in which anyone carrying a small quantity of the drug was
given a warning rather than arrested and prosecuted. Those caught with
the drug had their supply seized and officers were urged to use their
discretion when arresting people.

The scheme caused huge controversy, but its arguable success played a
part in the downgrading of cannabis.

Two evaluations of the project showed that, in the first six months, it
saved 1,350 hours of police time.

Supporters said that it allowed police to concentrate on more serious
drugs such as heroin and to target large-scale dealing.

However, critics pointed out that during the same period there was a 35
per cent increase in the number of people found in possession of the
drug and an 11 per cent rise in trafficking offences.

The rise was blamed on the huge influx of so-called "drug tourists" into
Lambeth who were lured in the mistaken belief that cannabis was legal in
the area.

During the first six months, almost half of the people who received a
warning after being found with the drug were from outside the borough.

Local residents complained of a rise in dealing of the drug and of
people openly smoking it, particularly in the streets around Brixton.

The experiment lasted until July 2002 before cannabis was reclassified
in 2004.

Even Mr Paddick believes that downgrading the drug is a step too far,
saying only this week that he believed it was "unnecessary".

He still insists that his softer approach is the best way forward.

Now Lambeth is at the centre of a new experiment, where people caught
with even a small amount of cannabis in certain streets will face
arrest. The " No Deal" initiative that came into force in December is
aimed at hitting both the supply and demand of the drug. Police have new
powers to stop and search suspected dealers and buyers and anyone
arrested more than once could be charged or issued with an anti-social
behaviour order.

Borough police commander Chief Superintendent Martin Bridger said: "We
want people to enjoy coming to Brixton without having to face drug
dealing, its associated crime and the behaviour it can lead to."

Local police also hope that the three-month trial scheme will stop the "
drug tourism".
For and against

DOES IT HAVE MEDICINAL EFFECTS?

YES

Cannabis - the "aspirin" of the 21st century - may protect against
ageing. Sativex, cannabis-derived, is licensed in Canada for multiple
sclerosis.

NO

Trials of Sativex in the UK have proved inconclusive. It was refused a
licence in 2004 until more convincing evidence was found.

DOES IT DAMAGE THE MIND IN THE LONG RUN?

YES

Cannabis is associated with a higher risk of schizophrenia and
depression. Up to 80 per cent of new cases of psychosis are set off by
cannabis abuse.

NO

Research argues that cannabis is associated with psychosis but not that
it causes it. Some 90 per cent of users are unharmed.

DOES IT HAVE HARMFUL SHORT-TERM EFFECTS?

YES

The drug distorts perception, affects short-term memory, in heavy doses
causes hallucinations and increases the risk of car and other accidents.

NO

Nearly half of those aged 16 to24 have used it, most without ill
effects. In moderation, it is relaxing.

DOES IT DAMAGE HEALTH?

YES

Up to 30,000 deaths a year could be caused by cannabis if its damaging
effects are comparable to those of tobacco, the BMJ reported in 2003.

NO

Two long-term studies of cannabis involving more than 100,000 people in
Sweden and the US found no increase in deaths.

DOES IT LEAD USERS ON TO HARDER DRUGS?

YES

One study showed that children who smoke it are up to five times more
likely to move to harder drugs than those who delay experimenting.

NO

Another study concluded that teenagers who took hard drugs did so
whether they had first tried cannabis or not.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!