Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Charles Clarke: Statement on the classification of cannabis and harm

Charles Clarke MP, Home Secretary

homeoffice.gov.uk

Thursday 19 Jan 2006

-----
Statement on the classification of cannabis and harm reduction measures

The House will know that last March I asked the Advisory Council on the
Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) to examine new evidence on the harmfulness of
cannabis and to evaluate whether it altered their assessment of the
drug's classification. In so doing, I was particularly concerned by
studies published since the Council's 2002 Report which seemed to
indicate strong links between cannabis and serious mental illness.

I am grateful to the Council for the work which they have done in
responding to my request and I am today placing a copy of their report
and conclusions in the Library of the House.

From their Report, I highlight two conclusions:-

The first is that cannabis is harmful and that its use can lead to a
wide range of physical and psychological harms and hazards; that the
mental health effects of cannabis are real and significant; that
cannabis is potentially harmful with short-term risks to physical
health; that a substantial research programme into the relationship
between cannabis and mental health should be instituted; that the
Government ought to seek to reduce the use of cannabis and that the
cultivation, supply and possession of cannabis should remain illegal.

The second is that the level of classification is only one amongst the
issues to be addressed and that priority needs to be given to proper
enforcement of the law, to education and to campaigning against the use
of cannabis.

The Council recommends a substantial Government education campaign,
strengthened medical services for those dependent on cannabis and
greater protection for those with pre-existing mental conditions that
place them at particular risk from cannabis use. The Council also
proposes further research to improve our understanding of the mental
health implications of cannabis use.

I have discussed these recommendations with my colleagues the
Secretaries of State for Education and Health and we have agreed to
accept and implement them energetically.

In so doing we accept that the use of cannabis significantly increases
the chances of developing chronic bronchitis and poses a potential lung
cancer risk. We accept the growing body of research which suggests that
cannabis may exacerbate or even trigger a range of serious mental health
problems including schizophrenia. In the words of the ACMD report, "the
mental health effects of cannabis are real and significant".

In summary cannabis is anything but harmless.

That is why possession of cannabis remains punishable by up to 2 years
in prison. It is why the Government strongly opposes proposals to
legalise the drug and will continue to do so. This month we have
introduced new powers under the 2005 Drugs Act to strengthen the hand of
the police in dealing with those caught supplying the drug.

But, as the Advisory Council's Report indicates, the illegal status of
the drug is not enough. We need a massive programme of public education
to convey the danger of cannabis use. Our aim is to provide effective
education in school about the risks posed by cannabis, to send the right
messages about the harms the drug does and to equip young people with
the knowledge and courage to make the right decisions. We will use the
FRANK media campaign and other channels to raise understanding about the
dangerous and illegal impact of cannabis consumption. The campaign,
delivered in partnership with the police, will publicise the penalties
for cannabis dealing, production and use.

Growing and selling cannabis is not harmless or idealistic. It is a
multi-million pound business, often organised by sophisticated and
violent criminals. I remind the House that those who deal in large
quantities of cannabis face maximum penalties of up to 14 years for this
offence.

That is why I have discussed with ACPO the need to focus police effort
and to take strong action to reduce the supply of cannabis. The police
and I agree that in recent years the production and major dealing of
cannabis have not always been targeted sufficiently vigorously and we
have agreed that this needs to change.

ACPO will now draw up a consolidated campaign of action to attack the
production and trafficking of cannabis which provides obscene profits
out of the misery of users. ACPO will aim to put cannabis farms out of
business and major dealers behind bars. At the same time it will revise
and strengthen its guidelines for dealing with cannabis-related crime.

As members will be aware the Home Office recently published a
consultation exercise to look at threshold levels of cannabis in a
person's possession which would deem them to be a supplier. I would like
to inform the House that my final decision will be at a considerably
lower threshold than the 500g suggested in the current consultation.

I believe that these education, health and police measures give clear
and comprehensive messages about the dangers of cannabis and a warning
that those who produce or are major dealers in cannabis will be brought
to justice. They are focused upon reducing the use of cannabis and I
believe that reduction of use should be the goal of all our drugs
policies, whether the drug is legal or illegal.

And it is the case that clarity is the best weapon we have in the fight
to reduce the use of cannabis. That is the basis upon which I approach
the issue of classification.

The more that I have considered these matters the more concerned I have
become about the limitations of our current system. Decisions on
classification often address different or conflicting purposes and too
often send strong but confused signals to users and others about the
harms and consequences of using a particular drug and there is often
disagreement over the meaning of different classifications. For example
many people wrongly interpreted the reclassification of cannabis to mean
that cannabis was not harmful and that its use was acceptable and even
legal.

For these reasons I will in the next few weeks publish a consultation
paper with suggestions for a review of the drug classification system,
on the basis of which I will in due course make proposals.

On the particular issues in front of us now:

As previously announced, I have accepted the advice to keep Methyl
Amphetamine as a class B drug, though this is subject to a review
reporting later this year. Similarly I have accepted the Council's
advice not to classify Khat as a controlled drug. I can today announce
that I have also asked the Advisory Council to report on the
classification of so called date rape drugs, including GHB and Rohypnol.

On cannabis, I have considered very carefully the advice which I have
received from many sources. I am influenced by data on levels of use of
the drug and evidence that cannabis use has fallen among 16-24 year olds
from 28% in 1998 to less than 24% last year. The preliminary assessment
is that, contrary to my personal expectation, reclassification has not
led to an increase in use. Moreover I accept the view of the Advisory
Council that further research on the mental health implications is
needed before any decision to reclassify is made.

Whilst I shall keep this matter under close review in light of the
factors which I have mentioned, I have decided to accept the Advisory
Council's recommendation, which is supported by the police and by most
drugs and mental health charities to keep the current classification of
cannabis.

Everyone needs to understand that cannabis is harmful and it is illegal.
Our education and health campaigns will clearly transmit that message.
Police operations will target the producers and major dealers so that
consumption of cannabis will be significantly reduced.

I hope that the government will have the support of the whole House in
seeking that outcome.

END
http://www.drugs.gov.uk/news-events/latest-news/901-cannabis-classification


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!