Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Letter: Time for drug rethink:

Don Barnard

Essex Evening Gazette [UK]

Wednesday 05 Nov 2003

-----
WITHOUT knowing all the facts it is difficult to comment on court
reports published in the media. Take for example; "Cannabis: man fined"
(Gazette October 31).

The reported said the defendant pleaded guilty to "possession" of 135
mgs of cannabis with an alleged £5 street value. (Five pounds for 135mg?
That makes it £37/gram, £1000/oz - unlikely! It's worth more like £0.69,
giving £5/gram.)

Notwithstanding that, let me say up front, I do not condone this crime.
The defendant is clearly a danger to society. And, his antisocial
behaviour will most certainly had an derogatory effect on his neighbours
quality of life!

So, in principle, I support the police for arresting him and referring
the offence to the Criminal Prosecution Service [CPS]. Why? Because
possession of cannabis is a crime and it's the policeman's job, to
detect crime and bring the criminal to justice.

My gripe is with the CPS: What overriding factor[s] prompted them to
bringing this case forward? What useful purpose did it serve? Who did it
benefit?

One final point - does anyone know how will the police deal with cases
like this after reclassification on January?

Time for justification!

Don Barnard








 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!