Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: 'Illogical' drugs grading under fire

Gaby Hinsliff, political editor

The Observer

Sunday 30 Jul 2006

---
'Illogical' drugs grading under fire.

Classification system should be changed to reflect more up-to-date
knowledge, says report by MPs.

The system for classifying illegal drugs in Britain, which determines
how users are punished, is unscientific and illogical and should be
completely overhauled, according to a report from MPs to be published
this week.

It will call for sweeping changes that could see substances such as
ecstasy and magic mushrooms, which campaigners have long argued are in
the most serious Class A with little reason, downgraded, and drugs
assessed more realistically according to the harm they cause.

The House of Commons select committee on science and technology will
also demand the publication of a paper prepared by Professor David Nutt,
a senior member of the government's advisory committee on drug misuse,
which makes radical recommendations to ministers about how drugs should
be classified.

Nutt is understood to have argued for an entirely new way of assessing
banned substances based on sound science rather than - as is the present
case - historical quirks, political opinion or research that could be 30
years old. His findings remain confidential so far.

The issue hit the headlines after Charles Clarke, the former Home
Secretary, agreed to review the decision taken by his predecessor David
Blunkett to downgrade cannabis from Class B to Class C, prompting
complaints from police that people no longer understood it was illegal
and from doctors that its possible impact on mental health was not being
taken seriously enough.

Clarke eventually decided not to reclassify cannabis but ordered a
review of the whole system - which had been virtually completed but had
not been published when he quit the cabinet in May. His successor, John
Reid, has not published the report and officials are concerned that it
may be shelved.

A source close to the committee inquiry said that the issue was too
important to ignore. 'Given the evidence, the committee had no
conclusion other than to call for sweeping changes,' the source said.

Drugs are currently ranked either A, B or C depending on the severity of
the harm caused. But scientists testifying before the committee argued
that in some cases, such as ecstasy, while it was known that users died
it was still not clear what caused the deaths. Meanwhile, deaths from
magic mushrooms were so rare as to be almost unknown. Yet both were
classified alongside heroin, which regularly causes fatal overdoses.

Ecstasy was classified in 1977, when little was known about it, while
fresh magic mushrooms - as opposed to the dried form, in which they
become hallucinogenic - were not even illegal until last year. The
committee heard there was little evidence that the classification level
of a drug served as a deterrent to users. There was some evidence from
the US that classifying a drug in Class A simply encouraged the price to
be driven up, making it more profitable for organised criminals to
become involved in smuggling it.

The select committee report will pose a challenge not only to the Home
Office, where Reid takes an instinctively tough line on drugs policy,
but to the Tories. Some members of the shadow cabinet are understood to
be anxious to reopen the debate about drugs and to support a thorough
overhaul of classifications, but the shadow Home Secretary, David Davis,
takes a hard line on drugs.

David Cameron did suggest during his campaign for the leadership that he
supported a broader review of drug classification - as a backbencher, he
signed up to another committee report suggesting the classification of
ecstasy should be reviewed. He is thought, however, to have agreed with
Davis when reappointing him to his shadow post that he would have free
rein to be tough on drugs policy.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!