Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Attitudes soften towards cannabis but harden against heroin and crack

Anthony King

The Telegraph

Monday 14 Aug 2006

---
Realism and pragmatism figure prominently in the majority of people's
attitudes to illegal drugs, says YouGov's survey for The Daily
Telegraph and the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts.

People deplore the use of drugs, especially hard drugs, but they
realise that drugs are here to stay. Almost everyone believes that the
idea of a drugs-free Britain is fantasy.

They evidently make a sharp distinction between hard drugs, such as
heroin and crack, and soft drugs, such as cannabis. Three quarters of
people think that the sale and possession of hard drugs should remain
serious criminal offences. Only a third think the same of soft drugs.

Far more people think that alcohol and tobacco cause the greatest
amount of harm to the largest number of people than think the same of
drugs. A considerable majority believes that alcohol and tobacco
should be classified with drugs in terms of the harm they cause.

There is also a widespread disposition to regard drug-users as people
potentially in need of treatment rather than as criminals. Most people
are convinced that treatment can work.

Predictably, people born since 1960 are much more likely than older
people to regard illegal drugs as a fact of life. For instance, 18 per
cent of younger people believe that the sale and possession of
cannabis should not only be decriminalised but be positively
legalised. Among the pre-war generation, that figure falls to eight
per cent.

The survey, one of the largest of its type conducted in Britain, was
commissioned by The Daily Telegraph and the RSA's commission on
illegal drugs, communities and public policy. Nearly 3,000 people were
interviewed.

Given an acceptance that, "whether we like it or not there will always
be people who use drugs", 89 per cent of people say the aim of public
policy should therefore be to reduce the amount of harm they cause
rather than to try to eradicate them.

Only 17 per cent of respondents believe that "it is possible for some
people to use some so-called hard drugs, such as heroin and cocaine,
quite safely without doing themselves and those around them any more
harm than drinking alcohol and smoking in moderation". But when
respondents were offered the same proposition about soft drugs such as
cannabis, nearly four times that proportion, 64 per cent, indicated
that they thought people could use soft drugs relatively harmlessly.

As the figures in the chart show, far more people think that hard
drugs are associated with crime than think the same of cannabis.

Asked about the state of the law, large majorities in all age groups -
a total of 73 per cent - reckoned that the sale of hard drugs and
their possession for personal use should remain criminal offences.
Asked the same question about soft drugs, the percentage fell to 38
per cent.

Among people born since 1960, 60 per cent believe that the possession
of soft drugs for personal use should be legalised completely or
treated as a lesser offence, like speeding or illegal parking.

Eighteen per cent of that generation would legalise the sale as well
as the possession of soft drugs.

Clearly, many people believe that drug-users who move on from soft
drugs to hard ones do so because they have fallen into a culture in
which dealers push all manner of drugs indiscriminately.

That belief probably underlies the widespread view that the law should
distinguish more sharply than it does now between hard and soft drugs.

Although the phrase "the demon drink" is seldom heard nowadays, the
survey shows that people still regard drink as the greater scourge.

YouGov asked which two, out of consuming alcohol, smoking tobacco and
taking illegal drugs, caused "most harm to the largest number of
people and their families". Seventy-eight per cent of people cited
alcohol, compared with 55 per cent citing illegal drugs.

By more than two to one, respondents reckon that different forms of
alcohol and tobacco should be classified, along with illegal drugs,
"according to how much harm they are thought to cause individuals and
society".

A striking feature of the findings is people's belief that, while the
possession and certainly the sale of most drugs should remain illegal,
the criminal law is not the best way of tackling the drugs problem.

Respondents were asked how people who had used illegal drugs but not
committed any other crime should be treated. Sixty-two per cent said
"they should be treated as people who may need treatment and other
forms of support". Only 30 per cent said "they should be treated as
criminals and brought before the courts".

People evidently believe that the criminal law should focus more on
the crimes associated with drug-taking rather than on drug-taking
itself.

Seventy-nine per cent of people are apparently convinced that
treatment can be effective in weaning users off drugs entirely (42 per
cent) or in making it possible for them to lead more normal,
crime-free lives (37 per cent).

If heroin users, in particular, fail to respond to other forms of
treatment, 48 per cent of respondents believe that "doctors should be
encouraged to prescribe maintenance doses of methadone or possibly
even heroin itself so that the heroin user's health can be monitored".

Only about a third, 36 per cent, think the courts need to intervene.

Most people believe that the connection between drugs and crime -
apart from the fact that drugs themselves are illegal - is
overwhelmingly monetary. Eighty-nine per cent are convinced that
drug-users are more likely than non-users to commit crimes "because
they steal to get money to buy drugs".

YouGov questioned 2,938 adults across Britain online between June 21 and 25.

The data have been weighted to conform to the demographic profile of
adults as a whole.

YouGov abides by the rules of the British Polling Council.

- Anthony King is professor of government at Essex University and
chairs the commission on illegal drugs, communities and public policy
established by the Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts,
Manufacturers and Commerce.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!