Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Amendment would legalize marijuana possession

Jennie Spillane

The Tribune

Friday 03 Nov 2006

---
This November, voters will decide whether to rewrite Colorado statutes
so it would be legal to possess up to one ounce of marijuana. Amendment
44, which is not a constitutional amendment, is almost identical to the
initiative passed by Denver voters in 2005.

Even though Denver voters passed the initiative, marijuana remains
illegal by state laws.

"We don't think that the city of Denver should have its hands tied by
state law," said Mason Tvert of the Alcohol-Marijuana Equalization
Initiative, an organization that's promoting Amendment 44 and defending
the legalization initiative passed in Denver.

Tvert said the organization tried to challenge Denver's enforcement of
state law forbidding possession of marijuana twice since passing the
initiative in 2005, but each time, the charges were dropped before going
in front of a judge and jury. Tvert sees Amendment 44 as a way to
sidestep the conflict between city and state laws, putting the decision
in the hands of individual cities.

If any city wants to keep marijuana illegal, it can pass its own
anti-marijuana legislation, Tvert said.

Weld County Sheriff John Cooke couldn't disagree with Tvert more. He
says marijuana should remain illegal.

"Ultimately, I think Amendment 44 is a bad amendment," said Cooke, who
also said the growing potency of the active ingredient in marijuana,
THC, increases the danger of using the drug. "Legalizing marijuana is
going to affect law enforcement. There will be more people using the
drug, and there will be more driving under the influence, which is going
to cause more accidents. The law is going to be a lot busier."

Even if Amendment 44 passes, there will still be a conflict between
state and federal law, but Tvert isn't worried about that. Federal laws
always supersede state laws, but still, almost 95 percent of people who
face federal marijuana-related charges are involved in marijuana
trafficking. The federal government won't be able to enforce simple
possession charges, Tvert said.

"This initiative will end the citations for individual possession of
marijuana," Tvert said.

Experts generally agree that marijuana's intoxicating properties might
pale in comparison to LSD and PCP, but it is seen by many as a "gateway"
drug, meaning its use will likely lead into the use of other, harder,
more intoxicating drugs.

"Legalizing marijuana is a sticky issue," University of Northern
Colorado senior Allie Beecher said. "If it is legalized, even though it
will only be for adults over 21, it is going to make it easier for
minors to possess it, which I don't agree with."

YOUNG VOTERS GUIDE:

Journalism students from the University of Northern Colorado have
compiled a series of election stories targeted toward young voters. This
is the second in the series, which will run through Monday in the Tribune.

AMENDMENT 44:

«Makes it legal for people 21 and over to possess up to one ounce of
marijuana.

« It is still illegal for individuals to possess more than one ounce of
marijuana, transfer marijuana to any person under 21, grow marijuana,
sell marijuana, use marijuana in public areas or drive under the
influence of marijuana.
http://www.greeleytrib.com/article/20061103/NEWS/111030116

--
WebBooks Amazing Amazon Store: http://astore.amazon.co.uk/webbooks05

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!