Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Judge tells DEA to issue license to grow pot for research

Bob Roehr

Bay Area Reporter

Thursday 15 Feb 2007

---
An administrative law judge has ruled that the Drug Enforcement
Administration should issue a license to a Massachusetts plant biologist
to allow him to cultivate marijuana for medical research purposes. All
such materials currently are produced at a facility at the University of
Mississippi under contract with the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Judge Marry Ellen Bittner concluded that granting the license is allowed
under international law; "there would be a minimal risk of diversion of
marijuana;" the current supply of marijuana for research purposes is
inadequate; and that issuing the license "would be in the public interest."

The exhaustive hearings were conducted over multiple days in August and
December 2005. The 87-page decision, which offers an excellent primer on
how the federal government regulates marijuana research, was released
February 12.

The DEA has 20 days in which to either accept the decision and issue the
license or appeal the decision to the director of the agency.

Lyle E. Craker, Ph.D., filed the lawsuit seeking to grow the marijuana.
"I've worked with medicinal and aromatic plants for the past 20 years. I
view medical cannabis as the same as any other botanical plant with
potential health benefits," he said.

"We need to separate the anecdotal from the tested ... If we don't do
this, society is going to lose, patients will continue to suffer," he added.

Barbara Roberts, Ph.D., is a former head of the Office of National Drug
Control Policy and a current board member of the pro-marijuana group
Americans for Safe Access. She called publication of the study
demonstrating the effectiveness of cannabis in treating peripheral
neuropathy, and Bittner's decision, a double blow to those who would
prohibit such research.

"The government wants to have it both ways, they say the [Abrams] study
doesn't have scientific rigor, so therefore there is no point in going
forward. And, by the way, we are not allowing the science to go forward
either," she said.

Roberts said this is "a wake up call for Congress to hold hearings" on
the 1999 Institute of Medicine report that supported research into the
medicinal potential of marijuana. While the organization hopes for such
hearings, it has yet to identify a member of Congress who will lead that
activity.
http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=1572

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!