Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Court upholds ban on medical marijuana

Adam Tanner

Reuters

Wednesday 14 Mar 2007

---
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A California woman with an inoperable brain
tumor may not smoke marijuana to ease her pain even though California
voters have approved its medicinal use, a U.S. appeals court ruled on
Wednesday.

In a much-watched test case, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found
there is no fundamental right to marijuana for medical purposes. The
ruling agreed with a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision.

The split three-judge opinion from Judge Harry Pregerson expressed
sympathy for some arguments by plaintiff Angel Raich, an Oakland
resident whose doctor testified she could die if she stopped smoking
pot. But the ruling backed the 1970 federal Controlled Substances Act
barring marijuana.

Raich, who suffers from a host of other ailments, says marijuana was
keeping her alive by easing her pain and bolstering her appetite. She
smokes marijuana, provided by two caregivers free of charge, every two
hours, and said she would continue to do so.

"The court has just sentenced me to death," Raich said in a statement.
At a later news conference, she added: "This is real medicine and the
federal government cannot tell us any different."

The court's decision said use of the drug for medical purposes was
gaining support but federal law still banned it.

"We agree with Raich that medical and conventional wisdom that
recognizes the use of marijuana for medical purposes is gaining traction
in the law as well," the judge wrote.

The ruling acknowledged the law could change if legislators reconsider
the issue.

"Although that day has not yet dawned, considering that during the last
10 years 11 states have legalized the use of medical marijuana, that day
may be upon on us sooner than expected," Pregerson said.

Voters in California, the nation's most populous state, became the first
to approve medical marijuana in 1996, putting it in direct conflict with
federal law. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has admitting using marijuana in
the past.

VICTORY FOR 'GANGA GURU'

In another high-profile case involving drugs, a Northern California U.S.
District judge found prosecutors had acted vindictively in adding four
counts of tax evasion and one count of money laundering against "ganja
guru" Ed Rosenthal.

The author of books including "Marijuana Growing Tips", Rosenthal was
sentenced in 2003 to one day in prison for violating federal law by
growing the plant.

The 9th Circuit overturned that decision last year and ordered a new
trial. The prosecutor revived the original marijuana charge and the new
counts.

Judge Charles Breyer denied Rosenthal's efforts to dismiss the original
marijuana charges, which the author said he would continue to fight.

"Not only is it a vindictive prosecutor, it's a vindictive government
and he's representing an attorney general who is out of step with
American democracy," Rosenthal, who said he has spent more than $150,000
on his defense, told Reuters.

(Additional reporting by Jim Christie)

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!