|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
MP's fury at cannabis moves
Peterborough Evening Telegraph
Tuesday 23 Oct 2001 BRITAIN'S stringent cannabis laws are to be relaxed next spring. Home Secretary David Blunkett said possession of cannabis should no longer be an arrestable offence and it should be re-classified as a "Class C" drug - the same as anti-depressants or steroids. It is remarkable turnaround for Labour, who pledged "zero tolerance" on drugs when they came to power in 1997, and it has sparked an angry reaction from the city MP Helen Clark. Features Editor Rachael Gordon reports. FOR years it's been seen as a hippy drug smoked by students and drop-outs in dingy bedsits. And arguments have raged furiously as to whether cannabis is a harmless social habit or the first rung on the ladder to serious drug abuse. Its a debate refuelled this week as Home Secretary David Blunkett announced proposals to relax the laws on possessing cannabis, which could come into force next spring. It would mean that possessing cannabis would no longer be an arrestable offence, and it would be re-classified from a class B to class C drug. Then cannabis possession would be dealt with by either a caution, which would go on a criminal record, or by summons, where the offender would be called to magistrates court to face a possible fine in the same way as many driving offences are dealt with. The maximum sentence for possessing the drug would also drop from five to two years. Mr Blunkett also signalled the use of cannabis for pain relief purposes would be authorised. But he emphasised: "There is no intention by me, or by other ministers, or the Prime Minister, that we legalise or decriminalise." Supporters today welcomed the move, and said it would free police to deal with the scourge of harder drugs, like heroin and cocaine, which were becoming more prevalent on our streets. But critics warned it could have serious health implications, causing mental health problems and add to the thousands of smoking related illnesses and deaths a year. So what do people in Peterborough think? The move has sparked an angry reaction from the city's Labour MP Helen Clark, who said she was completely opposed to the changes and "dumbfounded" as to why the Home Secretary had made the decision. She said: "I don't agree with it. In fact, I am very unhappy indeed. "I personally think it sends out totally the wrong message about drug use. "If we re-classify it, the implicit message is that it is all right, and we know that isn't true. "There are some very severe health risks which are only just coming to light. The medicinal benefits to multiple sclerosis sufferers are often cited, but we don't hear so much about research that has shown it may be a trigger and contributory factor in precipitating mental illness such as schizophrenia. What we don't hear about is the research showing possible links with male sterility and cancer. "And I am not convinced there isn't a link between starting on cannabis and going onto other harder drugs. People who are in that environment will also be coming into contact with ecstasy and cocaine as well." She added: "And what I don't understand is why, when we recognise that drugs are the most evil menace in society, and we have appointed a drugs Tsar, given money to drugs projects in Peterborough, including Bridgegate, and The Drugs Action Team, and have our own Drugs Tsar, Verina McEwan, why we are now on the road to decriminalisation. "If people think they are not going to get punished, they'll think they might as well do it. "The Home Secretary's argument that it leaves us free to deal with more serious drugs is too sophisticated. "The average kid who is tempted by drugs in Peterborough won't understand this, they'll just think smoking cannabis isn't a problem any more." Meanwhile, Peterborough's representative for the Legalise Cannabis Alliance, Marcus Davies (33), of Whitacre, Parnwell, Peterborough, welcomed the move, but said it didn't go far enough. As an epileptic, he said he had seen first-hand cannabis's medicinal uses. He said before he started smoking the drug in 1988, he had fits and seizures nearly every day. But in the last 13 years he's only had eight. He said: "It is a start, and shows that David Blunkett has been listening to what people have been saying for years, but it's only that a start. "It still doesn't solve the problems of actually getting hold of the drug. We still have to buy it from the cretins on the council estate who would sooner be selling you something else like heroin or cocaine. "What needs to happen is for the drug to be totally legalised so I can go to a tobacconist and buy it like we can buy cigarettes. At the moment you don't know what you're getting, or how strong it is, or if you are being ripped off. "Although it looks like my medicinal needs will be taken care of, it still doesn't tackle the issue that people like to take the drug socially. "And why not? People who go out and drink alcohol and get drunk get violent and want to fight, but people who get stoned don't. They want to sit and socialise and philosophise." Home Office figures show nearly 82,000 people were arrested for cannabis-related offences in 1999, more than double the figure for 1990. And last year, out of the 699 people dealt with by Cambridgeshire Police for possessing drugs, 499 were for cannabis. The argument goes that if the new laws are brought in then surely it would free up the police to deal with other more serious drugs- related crimes? Today, Cambridgeshire Police gave a guarded welcome to Mr Blunkett's announcement, but said it would continue to uphold current laws until any changes are made. Cambridgeshire Police Deputy Chief Constable Tom Lloyd said: "We welcome the initiative taken by the Home Secretary to further explore the recommendation to re-classify cannabis from a Class B to a Class C drug by seeking advice from scientific and medical experts on the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. "This will ensure the fullest consideration is given to the proposals before a final decision is made by Government, and is a sensible way forward." Drugs workers in Peterborough also welcomed the proposals, but said it did not mean cannabis safe. Lisa Mellan, deputy manager of Bridgegate Drugs Service, based in Broadway, Peterborough, said: "We welcome the decision to downgrade cannabis, because it came about following a healthy debate. "We support what the Government says about enabling us to concentrate on drugs which do more harm like heroin and cocaine. There isn't a lot of evidence to suggest it is the gateway drug, so we don't think this will lead to cannabis users going onto harder drugs. "However, it's important to stress it is not suitable for everyone and smoking cannabis can make some people very ill. By relaxing the laws does not mean it is a safe drug."
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!