|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
UK: Next Week's Election?
News and Star, Carlisle
Wednesday 24 Apr 2002 THE MOST important campaign in next week's council elections may already have been lost. Hard-hitting posters have sprung up around Carlisle aimed at getting young people into the ballot booths on Thursday. It is a campaign every local politician would back, yet it appears to have been largely fruitless. National and local experts are forecasting that turnout will be the lowest on record as voters abandon grass-roots politics in droves. Seventeen seats are up for grabs on Carlisle City Council, with all three group leaders up for re-election. Voters may already have noticed the traditional election door-knockers have fallen strangely silent. The Conservatives admit they are canvassing face-to-face in only five key wards, while Labour are out and about in most - but not all - contested areas. Neville Lishman, a Tory candidate in Belle Vue and the party's agent for Carlisle and Penrith and the Border, admitted yesterday the city was "probably" on course for a record low turnout. "We have had more people than usual saying they are not going to vote," he said. "But there are also a lot of people saying they have not made up their minds yet." The lowest turnouts - as little as 20 per cent - are likely to be in urban wards with high numbers of council tenants. That is both ironic and worrying, because the biggest single issue facing the city council is housing stock transfer. The district's 7,000 council tenants will vote in July on whether to hand their homes over to Liverpool-based charity Riverside Housing, operating locally as the Carlisle Housing Association. Riverside has pledged to pump more than £50 million into a massive programme of repairs if given the go-ahead. Government borrowing rules mean the housing association could borrow £13 million more than the council renovating ageing stock in Raffles, Currock, Upperby, Morton, Botcherby, Belah, Longtown, Brampton and Dalston. Riverside admits that any money it uses will eventually have to come from tenants' pockets. And voters in Birmingham threw the picture into confusion when they rejected a similar stock transfer earlier this month. All of which should have set the scene for a lively election debate. But while the ruling Conservative group are merrily talking up the benefits of stock transfer, Labour have been curiously silent. The group have taken up a "neutral" position and say they will abide by whatever the tenants decide is best. Liberal Democrat leader John Guest has spoken out strongly against the switch, but his team do not have a joint position. Conservative insiders say the confusing messages being given out by other groups is playing into their hands. The opposition has tried to make similar political capital over plans to build more than 1,000 new houses to the south-west of the city, the so-called "Morton Masterplan". The scheme will go to public inquiry after a Tory-dominated planning committee decided last June it was "minded to approve" development. Labour and Lib Dem candidates in Denton Holme, Dalston and Morton have been talking up their opposition to the plan, which they say will clog up city streets with traffic. The danger is that voters will agree with the Conservatives that the matter is out of council hands and a matter for Government inspectors. And then there are the side issues and minority candidates. Former mayor Colin Paisley will again stand for the Legalise Cannabis Alliance after a disappointing showing in last year's General election. Mr Paisley, 65, who is has a serious liver condition, will campaign not only on reform of drug law but also as an opponent of stock transfer and mass demolition on the Raffles estate.
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!