Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Sick Man's Historical Medical Cannabis Use Victory - Goes Unnoticed!

Don Barnard

Press Release

Tuesday 15 Oct 2002

---


"Cannabis smoker wins medical use victory" The Times. on October 10, [See
full article Ed. notes 1]


Brad Stephens appeared at Carmarthen Magistrates Court on 4th OCTOBER 2002
on a charge of possession of 55 grams of cannabis resin. Brad suffers from
severe spinal pain and is prescribed very strong analgesia from his GP, but
also uses cannabis to help cope with the pain and spasms he experiences. He
pleaded not guilty on the grounds of medical necessity and Article 8 of the
Human Rights Act ( the right to private and family life) . The Magistrates
acquitted him.

Brad Stevens was represented by M J Reed Solicitors
mike@mjreedsolicitors.co.uk
01267 281675


Several cannabis users have been acquitted by juries on the grounds of
medical necessity but this may be the first case of an acquittal by
Magistrates.

More information on other medical necessity defence cases contact:

Mark Gibson
[LCA Medical Spokesperson]
mark@parklandtrading.com

Mark Gibson's phone number - 01434 382066

Mark's wife (who has MS) has been found not guilty by a jury and not charged
on another occasion as a direct result of this acquittal.

A BONUS: Mark is also involved with an organisation called THC4MS which
helps people with MS in an unusual way!



Please, give it an airing!

Kind regards
Don Barnard
Press Officer
Legalise Cannabis Alliance
http://www.lca-uk.org
_____________________

LCA comment:

Legalise Cannabis Alliance Press officer Don Barnard said: "We welcome this
result, I never thought I would see this happen, Carmarthen Magistrates'
have put
another nail in the coffin of prohibition.

"I would urge others to challenged the law like Brad Stephens, which
incidentally the Independent Police federation Report recommended, it would
soon bring the matter to a head. Imagine 1000's of cannabis necessity cases
clogging up our legal system.

In Para 14 Times article below marked **

A Home Office spokeswoman ... said: "At the moment it is a class B
drug,..... It is illegal to possess it, even for medical reasons, .."

"If use of cannabis is illegal, why was Mr Stevens found Not Guilty by the
magistrates?


Last night, police and politicians said the decision added further
confusion to the law on cannabis and the Crown Prosecution Service
warned it was considering an appeal. [Source: The Western Mail,
Wales /10/2002]

"Are we to see a costly appeal by the CPS?

" Both the House of Lords and the BMA called for an erasing of the law for
people forced to use cannabis to ease suffering from various ailments. This
advice has been ignored by the Government and police who continue to arrest
sick people and drag them through the courts. This must stop forthwith.

"All magistrates should be encourage to be less pedantic OR relying on bias
advise of Court Clerks and rule on cases as they see fit."

"Magistrates and juries should consider the facts when deliberating on
cases involving medical necessity.

"Judges should be forced to tell juries; if they believed that the law had
been applied wrongly they can bring in a not guilty verdict in the face of
the law.

....[paragraph 16 marked ***]
The Association of Chief Police Officers spokesman said: "...at the moment a
lot is down to the discretion of the police officer."

"We have been encouraging police officer to use this discretion for years,
we would hope that in the light of this verdict, all Constables will be
compassionate when interacting with "obvious" medicinal cannabis users. And,
the CPS will filters out cases it would clearly be unjust to proceed with.

Medical necessity means that there was no reasonable alternative to
'breaking the law' and that the law would be wrongly applied in such a case.


REPLY TO
press@barnard.lca-online.net
Phone: 07984 255015
_____________________________

Editors Notes

1: CANNABIS SMOKER WINS MEDICAL USE VICTORY

Source: The Times
Pub Date: Thursday, October 10, 2002
Subj: UK: Cannabis smoker wins medical use victory
Author: Simon de Bruxelles
Contact: editor@the-times.co.uk


A MAN who suffers from a painful spinal condition became the first person
to be cleared by
magistrates of cannabis possession on the ground of medical necessity.

Brad Stephens, 45, said that smoking cannabis was the only way to ease the
pain
of his spinal condition
without large doses of morphine.

Carmarthen Magistrates' Court was told that police found 55g (1.9oz) of the
class B drug in a raid on his
home.

Mr Stephens admitted in court to being a regular cannabis user but pleaded
not
guilty to possessing the
drug.

Mike Reed, for the defence, told the court: "Mr Stephens suffers from
cervical
spondylosis, a degenerative bone disease of the upper spine and neck. He is
on
a heavy dose of morphine and over time the body needs bigger and bigger
doses
to combat pain.

"Large doses of morphine can seriously damage health, so by taking cannabis
he
reduces his dependency on morphine and the potentially fatal risk. In
effect,
the cannabis is saving his life."

The magistrates accepted it was a medical necessity for Mr Stephens to take
the
drug and found him not
guilty. He was released, but the magistrates ordered the cannabis resin,
which
has an estimated street
value of 300, to be destroyed.

The Lord Chancellor's Department confirmed yesterday that although juries
have
found cannabis users not guilty in similar circumstances, this is the first
time that magistrates have acquitted someone on
medical grounds.

Mr Reed said after the hearing: "We needed to prove that the cannabis was
doing
more than simply easing his symptoms. There is a legal defence of necessity
but
it is very difficult to succeed with.

"But the court accepted it was a medical necessity for him to take the drug
and
found him not guilty."

Mr Stephens said: "I am over the moon. I have been taking cannabis for four
years because of my illness.

"The police have charged me with possession before and I have been fined
after
admitting it. It has cost me a lot of money in fines so this time I thought
if
I plead not guilty I would see what happened.

"I was scared that they would stop me using the drug - the effects on my
quality of life would be
devastating."

**A Home Office spokeswoman said possession of cannabis is still a criminal
offence with a maximum jail term of five years. She said: "At the moment it
is
a class B drug, but there are moves to bring it down to class C. It is
illegal
to posess it, even for medical reasons, although we are supporting research
into
this."

A spokesman for the Lord Chancellor's Department said: "As far as we are
aware,
this is the first time this has happened. Magistrates have the power to rule
on
cases as they see fit."

***An Association of Chief Police Officers spokesman said: "People have been
getting confused about the law relating to cannabis, and at the moment a lot
is
down to the discretion of the police officer."

*Cervical spondylosis occurs when the spinal canal in the neck is narrowed
by
outgrowths of bone that
compress the nerves. Jerky leg movements and an unsteady walk are early
signs.
The pain can range from mild discomfort to crippling, depending on the
severity
of the condition.

Treatment may begin with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to relieve
pain
and reduce
swelling, but in extreme cases more powerful painkillers may be needed.
Surgery
to remove bone
spurs can give some patients lasting relief.

end
______________________





 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!