Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Why do they call it the Criminal justice Bill!

Don Barnard

Press Briefing

Tuesday 03 Dec 2002

---

From: Press Office
The Legalise Cannabis Alliance
DonBarnard@lca-uk.org
Phone 07984 255015

Please forward to any assignment editor or journalist who you believe may be
interested in this.
_______________________________________________________

Why do they call it the Criminal justice Bill!

This week [Tuesday/Wednesday] we are to see parliament postulating on
the Courts and Criminal Justice Bill which allegedly, will include removing
the right of trial by jury for some offences. Retain the right of the police
to arrest for cannabis possession offence after rescheduling to Class
"C"-onfusion and increase the sentences for possession and supply of all
Class "C" substances.

It is worth note here: David Blunket "shelved" the recommendation to remove
the right of jury for offences carrying a maximum sentences of 2 years ..on
the week he announced reclassifying cannabis. Which effectively reduces the
sentance for cannabis possession to 2 years!

Don Barnard LCA Press Officer said: I am curious whether he is going to take
it off the shelf again, or, has he abandoned it?

TRAGICALLY, few people are fully informed about the duties and powers of the
juror. Those of you who have done jury service will recall the judge
reminding you of your oath: "You must reach a verdict on the evidence
alone." But, do you remember him telling you that you could also return a
verdict according to your conviction?

Mr Barnard said: "He should have" - "Since the signing of the Magna Carta in
1215, trial by jury has been a fundamental right for the accused person.

From Magna Carta

[29] No Freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or be disseised of his
Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any
otherwise destroyed; nor will we pass upon him,
nor condemn him, but by lawful Judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the
Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either
Justice or Right.

http://www.ukcia.org/pollaw/lawlibrary/magna-carta.htm

"The Legalise Cannabis Alliance condemns any attempt by parliament to remove
this final safeguard against tyranny by the state" ... It should be resisted
by everyone regardless of political persuasions.."

To support his case Don cites two of the greatest statesmen of our time.

Thomas Jefferson. "I consider Trial by Jury as the only anchor yet imagined
by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its
constitution."

Winston Churchill. "...the great principle of habeas corpus and trial by
jury, which are the supreme protection invented by the British people for
ordinary individuals against the state. The power of the executive to cast a
man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and
particularly to deny him judgement by his peers for an indefinite period, is
in the highest degree odious, and is the foundation of all totalitarian
governments."

Don said: "According to the Magna Carta, one of the fundamental elements of
our unwritten constitution is: The law itself can and must be called into
question. Is the law fair? Is the law just?"

This right was first put to the test in 1670 - From around 1650, common law
juries begun to refuse to enforce the religious intolerance of the Crown by
acquitting Quakers for violating Parliament's degree that "All, Religious
services conformed to the Anglican ritual.

Jurors were frequently fined, for returning not guilty verdicts in these
cases. Things came to a head when the government increased the severity of
the enforcement on the Quakers, ordering that all the doors of Quaker
Churches be locked and guarded by soldiers.

This resulted in Penn and Mead preaching in the street and their inevitable
arrest and trial. The jury acquitted them.

A plaque commemorating this historical event can be found at the entrance to
the Old Bailey law courts:

"Near this site William Penn and William Mead were tried in 1670 for
preaching to an unlawful assembly in Gracechurch Street. This tablet
commemorates the courage an endurance of the jury, Thomas Vere, Edward
Bushel and ten others, who refused to give a guilty verdict against them
although they were locked up without food for two nights and fined for their
final verdict of Not Guilty."

NOTE: Probably, the most recent ground breaking case of juries refusing to
find a defendant guilty in the face of the law in the UK is Regina v
Rob Cannabis

Three counts:

A] Offering cannabis for sale at an auction at Speakers' corner on 29
September 2001;

B] Possessing two addressed envelopes of cannabis with intent to supply it
to named MS patients;

C] Possessing cannabis found when police searched his home in Glastonbury.

SEE http://www.freecannabis.com/ and http://www.ukcia.org/

Mr Cannabis defending himself, in his summing up to the jury asserted that
it was the jury's right to deliver a perverse verdict of not guilty -
Presiding Judge Mr Karston interrupted and told the jury,
It wasn't their 'right' but it was within "their power" to do so - The jury
failed to reach a verdict

Contact for Mr Cannabis:
Phone: 01458 833 713
01458 833 236 (answering machine)
.
Mr Barnard said: "Clearly, it is a juror's duty to judge the application of
law itself, and not just whether a defendant has committed a crime according
to that law.

"In short, A jury, after finding a defendant guilty under the on the
evidence, should go on to consider if the law had been applied correctly.
And, if they believe the defendant had no alternative or overriding
mitigation but to break the law - They can return a not guilty verdict.

There have been many cases of late where juries have used these powers to
return not guilty verdicts where a defence of duress and/or medical
necessity has been put forward for possession and cultivating cannabis
charges.

JOUNALIST RESEARCHERS NOTE: More on Medical Necessity.

Contact LCA Health Spokesperson
Mark Gibson
01434 382066

Mark's wife Lezley [aka Cannabis Lezley] was found not guilty by a jury for
cannabis possession which she used to self medicate for her MS - So they
have both walked the line and would love to talk the line with you!

Both Mark and Lezley are declared LCA candidates for 2004 election. See
press release "120 candidates for the LCA" - 29 November 2002:

http://www.lca-uk.org/displayitem.php?articleid=765


The Legalise Cannabis Alliance
Cyfreithloni Cannabis Cyfathrach
A registered UK political party.
PO Box 198,
Norwich NR3 3WB
email lca@lca-uk.org
Press contact: Don Barnard 07984 255015
___________

"There are good laws and there are occasionally bad laws, and it conforms to
the highest traditions of a free society to offer resistance to bad laws,
and to disobey them." - Alexander Bickel





 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!