|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
US CA: Feds To Target Pro-pot Doctors
Alameda Times-Star (CA)
Friday 04 Aug 2000 Subj: US CA: Feds To Target Pro-pot Doctors Pubdate: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 Source: Alameda Times-Star (CA) FEDS TO TARGET PRO-POT DOCTORS SAN FRANCISCO -- The Department of Justice pledged to continue resisting California's voter-approved medical marijuana law Thursday, arguing that the government has the right to penalize doctors who recommend cannabis by revoking their licenses to dispense medication. Justice department lawyers argued their position in U.S. District Court here during what may be the final stage of a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU contends that the government's position violates doctors' free speech rights, and that many doctors now resist recommending pot for fear of losing their federal right to prescribe medication. U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup was expected to rule within weeks, lawyers said, and the ruling could have broad implications for several states with similar laws. Measures similar to California's Proposition 215, which voters passed in 1996, have passed in Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington state. Department of Justice lawyer Joseph W. Lobue told the judge that the government doesn't care whether California voters approved the so-called Compassionate Use Act, which allows patients to grow and possess marijuana for medical use with a doctor's recommendation. "It doesn't matter what California says," Lobue argued. Lobue said the government would take the same position "in Oklahoma if they had that law." Legal jockeying in California began three years ago when White House drug policy chief Barry McCaffrey said that doctors who recommended marijuana would lose their federal licenses to prescribe controlled substances. He said the doctors would be excluded from Medicare and Medicaid and could face criminal charges. In 1997, a federal judge issued a temporary order prohibiting the government from taking such action pending the case's resolution. The 10 doctors and five of their patients, all of whom are represented by the ACLU, say marijuana can be beneficial to patients with AIDS, HIV, cancer, glaucoma, and seizures or muscle spasms associated with chronic, debilitating conditions. The government's position is that marijuana has no proven medical benefits and that the Federal Drug Administration has not authorized doctors to even recommend it. California Attorney General Bill Lockyer has urged Attorney General Janet Reno to ease the federal government's resistance to California's attempts to implement its initiative. "The voters in my state have endorsed the medicinal use of marijuana," Lockyer wrote to Reno in October. In Thursday's case, Judge Alsup appeared perplexed by the government's position. He said the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in September that the government cannot prosecute someone who uses marijuana "as a medical necessity." "If that's true, who's going to declare if it's a medical necessity if it's not a doctor?" the judge asked Lobue. "How do you square that, holding with your position in this case that a doctor cannot even recommend marijuana?" Lobue responded by saying that a doctor should have to decide what constitutes a medical necessity in federal court, before trying to decide in a medical office. Doing that, Lobue said, would prevent the government from trying to revoke that doctor's license to dispense drugs. "The physician would have to testify," Lobue said.
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!