|
After you have finished reading this article you can click here
to go back.
UK: Jail Threat May Be Lifted From Cannabis Smokers
Philip Webster, Political Editor
Times, The (UK)
Friday 14 Jan 2000
UK: Jail Threat May Be Lifted From Cannabis Smokers
Subj: UK: Jail Threat May Be Lifted From Cannabis Smokers
Source: Times, The (UK)
Pubdate: January 14 2000
Author: Philip Webster, Political Editor
Jail Threat May Be Lifted From Cannabis Smokers
By Philip Webster, Political Editor
Possession of cannabis would no longer be punishable by jail under a
controversial shake-up of Britain's drug laws to be recommended by an
independent inquiry soon.
The most far-reaching investigation of drugs legislation for a quarter of a
century will also call for a relaxation of the ban on the use of cannabis
for medical purposes and is expected to propose that Ecstasy be downgraded
from a "hard" to "soft" drug.
The report is due to be published in mid-March by a committee of inquiry
established in 1997 by the Police Foundation, whose president is the Prince
of Wales. The Prince's Trust has made a financial contribution to the
inquiry, which was set up to determine whether the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
was effective.
The inquiry is chaired by Lady Runciman, a former member of the
Government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, and its members
include senior police officers.
Lady Runciman declined to comment on the details of the report last night
and made plain that it had yet to be completed. Other sources said that
several key decisions remained to be taken.
However, The Economist today publishes an account of the expected contents
of the report; and The Times has learnt that the most controversial
recommendation will be a proposal for the "depenalisation" of cannabis
possession - for which 500 people were jailed in 1997.
The inquiry has found that the 1971 Act is inconsistent and imposes heavy
demands on the criminal justice system. It suggests that cannabis
possession, now punishable by up to seven years in prison, should instead
by dealt with by fines or other penalties.
The proposal falls short of the "decriminalisation" favoured by some
members of the inquiry team, but it is understood to have felt constrained
by the need to come up with a report that might eventually be embraced by
the Government. Even so, removing the threat of prison would be seen as
moving towards the more liberal approach of The Netherlands, where cannabis
is freely available for sale in small quantities.
Tony Blair and Jack Straw are extremely cautious on the subject of reform
and are unlikely to back decriminalisation of the drug. Only Charles
Kennedy, leader of the Liberal Democrats, has backed calls for a royal
commission to consider such a move. The Home Secretary has even rejected a
Lords report recommending that cannabis should be available for medicinal
use - a proposal that will feature in the Police Foundation report.
The report is also believed to make a new distinction between supply and
possession, apparently suggesting that possession of less than two grammes
of cannabis should be treated as a minor offence, but over two grammes
could attract a charge of supply.
The report is certain to be attacked by the Conservatives. Ann Widdecombe,
the Shadow Home Secretary, said: "Existing penalties should continue."
After
you have finished reading this article you can click here
to go back.
|