|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
UK: Hostel Managers Lose Appeal In Drugs Case Ian Burrell, Home Affairs Correspondent The Independent Friday 22 Dec 2000 Pubdate: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 Source: Independent (UK) Copyright: 2000 Independent Newspapers (UK) Ltd. Website: http://www.independent.co.uk/ Author: Ian Burrell, Home Affairs Correspondent HOSTEL MANAGERS LOSE APPEAL IN DRUGS CASE Two charity workers were rightly convicted of failing to prevent heroin dealing in their hostel, the Court of Appeal decided yesterday, and issued a stark warning to all organisations who work with drug users. In a judgment that shocked the charity sector, the judges said: "This case must serve as a warning that no one, however well intentioned, can with impunity permit their premises to be used for the supply of Class A drugs." Ruth Wyner and John Brock, the so-called Cambridge Two, were sentenced to five years and four years respectively at King's Lynn last year after an undercover operation by police disguised as homeless men. The pair were released in July at a hearing that gave them leave to appeal against their conviction and sentence. The Court of Appeal told them on December 1 that they would not be returned to jail Yesterday the judges agreed the charity workers "did not stand to make any commercial or other gain" and that their sentences were "very significantly too high". Wyner and Brock, who served seven months, should have been sentenced to 18 months, the court said. But harsher sentences could follow in any other cases. "We stress that a sentence longer than [18 months] may well be appropriate if, in the future, others in the position of the appellants commit this offence." Later, Kevin Flemen, senior project officer for the drug charity Release, said the legislation under which the prosecution was brought also applied to cannabis. "Anyone working with drug users runs the risk of a substantial custodial sentence if they fail to stop the supply of drugs on their premises." Lord Justice Rose, sitting with two other judges, dismissed claims by the charity workers that the trial judge had wrongly directed the jury. They said the key issue was whether Wyner and Brock knew there was heroin dealing and whether they took "all reasonable steps" to prevent it. The judges said the two, who operated a strict policy of client confidentiality, would not co-operate with police after a man died from an overdose at their Wintercomfort hostel in Cambridge in 1998. Although the charity had a written policy banning drug use on the premises, the judges found a book listing people barred for drugs "demonstrated both the rarity of bans of any significant length and the repeated flaunting of such bans as were imposed". The judges said: "It is ... apparent ... the jury could only have concluded that both appellants were aware of, or shut their eyes to, an obviously significant level of dealing." They agreed Wyner and Brock "lacked the evil motive usually a feature of criminal behaviour". The judgment went on: "They were caring for the unfortunate, doing a job which few would enjoy. Both appellants are 49 and hitherto of impeccable character. They have dependent and loving families. They are spoken of in the highest terms by those who know them." But the court said a jail sentence was appropriate because "these offences permitted heroin dealing, which was capable of having a continuously damaging effect on those in the appellants' care". Outside the court, Ruth Wyner said she had hoped the conviction would be quashed. "It's a big disappointment and I feel I have been badly misrepresented by the court. I especially feel bad for the people working in the homeless sector who have a sword of Damocles hanging over them." After 20 years working with the homeless, she admitted it would be "difficult to earn a living when you have a conviction on your record". John Brock said the outcome was "par for the course" in "two and a half years of injustice. You are dealing with very vulnerable people with massive problems. You do your best and when that is not seen as good enough you are branded a criminal." The Crown Prosecution Service said it felt vindicated. Richard Crowley, chief crown prosecutor for Cambridge, added: "The actions of Wyner and Brock took them beyond the role set for them by the trustees of the Wintercomfort charity. It is clear both defendants broke the law."
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!