Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Ministers 'ignoring drugs issue'

BBC News Online

Wednesday 10 Jan 2001


BBC News Online
Wednesday, 10 January, 2001, 08:43 GMT

Ministers 'ignoring drugs issue'


The government has been accused of ignoring calls for a serious debate on
radical changes to the way the police and the courts deal with drug abuse.
The criticism came from Dame Ruth Runciman, the author of a Police
Foundation report issued in March last year which proposed that people
caught in possession of cannabis, ecstasy and LSD should not be sent to
prison.

The government will respond formally to the report next month, but drugs
"czar" Keith Hellawell insisted that suggestions that ministers did not want
a debate were wrong.

The issue of a mature and rational, national debate - whether they are ready
or willing to go into that is open to question given the current response
Dame Ruth Runciman

In a speech to a major drugs conference hosted by the Joseph Rowntree
Foundation in London on Wednesday, Dame Runciman will call on the government
not to "cherrypick" the report's conclusions.
The report, the product of a two-and-a-half year inquiry, also recommended
that cannabis users should not be criminalised.

It called instead for a new crime of drug dealing to target those profiting
from illegal drugs.

Dame Runciman said it was disappointing that no ministers or representative
of Mr Hellawell would be attending the conference.

Speaking to the BBC, she said: "That is disappointing and I don't think what
one would necessarily have expected.


"The issue of a mature and rational, national debate - whether they are
ready or willing to go into that is open to question given the current
response.

"The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has defined the conference as moving the
drugs debate forward.

"It would have been an extremely constructive exercise to have attending
also to partake in what should be a dialogue and not a slanging match
members of the government and representatives responsible for drugs policy."


Dame Runciman added: "There's no doubt the government is committed to a
successful policy to tackle drug abuse.

"We think the strategy could have a much better drug law to help it deliver
its objectives."

But Mr Hellawell insisted that the the government had taken full notice of
the report.

"The idea that we never have a debate about this, the idea that the
government just says no and the idea that government policy isn't up with
public thought is quite frankly total nonsense," he said.


"The problem is that usually all you get reported is the side that wants
change, particularly legalisation.

"The government does reflect public policy and it does reflect many of the
things the foundation's report said."

Responding to suggestions in the report that the government should
discriminate between drugs and categorise them more accurately, he said this
was already the case.

"The government's policy, which was published more than two years ago and
predates the Runciman report substantially, actually says we focus on the
drugs that cause the most harm. That is heroin, cocaine and some of the
synthetic drugs.

"That we change the way in which we operate to pay most of our attention and
most of our resources to deal with those difficult drugs."


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!