Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Drug Reform Initiatives Receive Voter Support

Washington Post (DC)

Thursday 09 Nov 2000

---
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Authors: William Booth and Rene Sanchez, Washington Post Staff Writers



LOS ANGELES, Nov. 8 - Voters in the nation's most populous state
approved a radical shift in the war on drugs, saying drug abusers should
be placed in treatment programs instead of being sent to prison.

California's Proposition 36 will bar state courts from sentencing those
convicted of simple drug possession to prison, and instead will route
abusers of even the hardest drugs--such as heroin and cocaine--into
mandatory treatment. The measure could keep as many as 37,000 drug
users a year out of jail.

"There has not been law passed in this country in recent memory that
will reduce the number of incarcerated Americans as much as this one
measure in California," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the
Lindesmith Center in New York, one of the country's leading drug-reform
organizations.

The question on what to do about drug abuse was one of 200 initiatives
and propositions on the ballot Tuesday in 42 states. Voters showed a
mixed mood on a range of important national issues.

They embraced public education but seemed reluctant to expand gay
rights. They rallied behind tougher gun control but rejected physician-
assisted suicide. They backed the medical use of marijuana but defeated
a call for mandatory universal health care.

Perhaps the biggest loser was the school voucher movement. In
California and Michigan, initiatives proposing to give students public
stipends to attend private schools were crushed.

About 70 percent of voters in both states rejected the voucher
initiatives, which had sparked the most expensive ballot battles in the
nation. In California, spending reached $50 million. And nearly half
of that came from a Silicon Valley multimillionaire who led the campaign
to get vouchers on the ballot. Had it passed, the measure would have
made all 6 million of the state's students eligible for $4,000 stipends
to attend private schools. It also would have radically altered the
nation's largest public education system.

But California Gov. Gray Davis (D) spent months attacking it in
television ads. Today, opponents of vouchers rejoiced at their
overwhelming victories at the polls here and in Michigan. Bob Chase,
president of the National Education Association, which represents more
than 2 million teachers, said the results should "put an end to the
myth" that voters support school voucher plans.

"The public has no enthusiasm for new voucher experiments," Chase said.
"Americans are unified in their support for investments in improving
public schools, where 90 percent of America's children attend."

Vouchers are a core part of Texas Gov. George W. Bush's education
agenda and a priority for many Republicans in Congress, who both say the
idea would help poor minority students in failing public schools. But
one prominent Republican in California, Ron Unz, said today they should
reconsider. "It really seems vouchers are just not popular," he said.
"Republicans should start taking this into account."

Unz was the political force behind another nationally important ballot
initiative in Arizona to end bilingual education. It passed with
landslide support, just as a similar proposal of his in California did
two years ago. Unz predicted that campaigns to end bilingual education
and replace it with intensive English immersion programs for immigrant
students will continue to spread across the country.

There was other good news for public education from Tuesday's votes. In
South Carolina, voters approved a state lottery expected to send $150
million a year directly to schools. In North Carolina, voters backed a
state record $3.1 billion in bonds for higher education. In California,
voters made it easier to raise local property taxes to fund schools.

Another closely watched issue on the ballot was gun control. In
Colorado and Oregon, initiatives to require background checks of all
purchasers at gun shows passed with ease, despite strong opposition from
the National Rifle Association.

In Colorado, the fight over the measure was particularly emotional
because of the massacre last year at Columbine High School in suburban
Denver that left 13 people dead. Some of the weapons used in that
shooting were purchased by a teenager who was not subject to any
scrutiny. She later told authorities that she would have not likely
purchased the guns had she faced background checks.

Gun control groups brought the measures directly to the ballot after the
legislatures in Colorado and Oregon narrowly failed to pass a similar
requirement for background checks. And this time, they even outspent
the NRA in making their case to voters. They also won the support of
Arizona Sen. John McCain (R). Gun control advocates called the passage
of the two measures in western states that have large numbers of
hunters, sportsmen and gun enthusiasts a tremendous boost to their cause
nationally.

Jonathan Cowan, president of the group Americans for Gun Safety, called
the ballot victories "a clear message to policymakers across the country
that the debate on guns has changed dramatically."

On other social issues, such as extending gay rights, voters around the
country showed a more conservative mind-set. In Nevada and Nebraska,
they supported initiatives banning gay marriage, just as voters did in
California earlier this year. In Maine, a ballot measure that would
have provided a specific protection against discrimination for gays
narrowly failed.

Also in Maine, voters rejected an initiative that would have made the
state the second in the nation (after Oregon) to legalize physician-
assisted suicide.

One of the most symbolic measures appeared in Alabama, where voters
agreed to rewrite the state constitution to overturn a 1901 prohibition
against marriages between blacks and whites. The repeal of the
interracial marriage ban won with 60 percent of the vote, which was a
far less resounding victory than many had hoped for.

The law on the books barring interracial marriage in Alabama was
unenforceable and had been overruled by Supreme Court decisions, but it
was still contained in the Alabama Constitution.

And then there were the drug reform initiatives. A trio of
multimillionaire businessmen led by international financier George Soros
spent more than $6 million to win approval of five of six measures they
backed around the country.

In addition to the winning measure that requires treatment and not jail
time for drug possessors in California, the use of "medical marijuana"
was approved by voters in Nevada and Colorado, while measures to make it
more difficult for police to acquire and use the proceeds of drug-
related forfeitures passed in Oregon and Utah.

Another drug reform effort failed in Massachusetts, however. And an
attempt to completely legalize marijuana in Alaska failed by a large
margin. That measure was not part of the Soros package of legislation.

Whether the rest of nation follows California's lead in social policy is
unknown. But what is clear is that a tough-on-crime state, with the
largest per capita prison population in the world, has reached a turning
point in its approach to illegal drugs.

The measure, approved by some 60 percent of the electorate, is expected
to save the state as much as $150 million a year in incarceration costs,
and might even allow California to forgo building another $500 million
prison in the near future.

The treatment measure was opposed by prosecutors, prison guards and
White House drug czar Barry McCaffrey, who argued that taking away the
threat of jail time robbed addicts of an important incentive to clean
up.

The wins for drug reform follow a consistent string of victories for
Soros and his partners--John Sperling, founder of the University of
Phoenix, and auto insurer Peter Lewis. Since 1996, they have won drug
reform measures in nine states and the District.


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!