|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
Leader: The international war on drugs is lost
The Guardian
Wednesday 04 Jul 2001 Ten years ago Sir Keith Morris, the British ambassador to Colombia, was a firm believer in the war on drugs being waged by the US with the support of Europe against the drug barons of Latin America. Ten years on he has concluded the war, which still continues, "is unwinnable, costly and counter-productive". In his article today, he describes the devastating effects which the drug war has had on Colombian society, but also recognises the cultural change which has taken place towards recreational drugs in the developed world. He wants a new debate about how drugs could be controlled more effectively within a legal framework. More controversially, he rules out decriminalisation as "an unsatisfactory halfway house because it would leave the trade in criminal hands, give no help at all to the producer countries, and would not guarantee consumers a safe product or free them from the pressure of pushers". The debate which Sir Keith wants to spark will be welcomed by many people in the drug treatment world. The international war against drugs has always been as doomed to failure as the domestic war played out on British streets. The criminal syndicates are too well dug-in, the profits too enticing, and the demand from consumers too widespread for effective criminal sanctions. More serious still, even if President Bush's father had succeeded in ending the Colombian drug trade, that would not have resolved the problem. Given the resources available to the multi-billion pound criminal industry, it would not have taken the traffickers long to produce some synthetic substitute. As Ben Whittaker noted in his book The Global Fix over a decade ago: "We can no more hope to end drug abuse by eliminating heroin and cocaine than we could alter the suicide rate by outlawing high buildings or the sale of rope." Sir Keith would like to explore some form of legalisation. There are strong arguments, which rightwing journals such as the Economist and Sunday Telegraph were pushing as long ago as 1988: the failure of successive wars on drugs over 20 years; the criminalisation of young people; the contamination of drugs which unregulated trade by the criminal underworld allows; as well as an increase in crime by users needing to pay high prices for an illegal product. Legalisation would improve the purity of the products and offer the chance of taxing the producers to provide more resources for treatment. But there are equally strong arguments against. Legalisation would increase addiction, offer fewer incentives to stop taking drugs, and multiply the damage that is already being wreaked. Remember, many addicts want to stop. The harm which crack, cocaine and LSD cause is serious. Moreover, addicts are not just hurting themselves, but others too: in road accidents, passing on the habit to others, loss of family income. There are also serious problems raised by international law. As a signatory to international treaties dating back to 1920 but including three separate UN conventions (1961, 1971, 1988), the UK is obliged to make trafficking a criminal offence. Moreover, legalising hard drugs, would not stop criminal syndicates producing alternative illegal substitutes. Yet, as the Police Foundation's independent inquiry into our outdated current laws noted last year, international law allows considerable leeway on how domestic law deals with users. This is where the debate could begin. The government's response to last year's Runciman report was pathetic, rejecting 24 of her recommendations. But that was before an election. Viscountess Runciman's report, which reordered the classification of drugs by modern analysis of their harmfulness, would be a useful starting point. It could move on to make the possession of certain drugs - cannabis for a start - legal. The current lord chief justice floated just such an approach in 1993. It is time the debate began.
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!