|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
UK: We've said it once. We say it again: legalise cannabis
The Independent On Sunday
Sunday 08 Jul 2001 According to the poll we publish today nearly half the population is in favour of legalising cannabis or is willing to consider such a move. This is a significant shift in opinion since The Independent on Sunday launched its campaign for the legalisation of cannabis four years ago. The newspaper made waves at the time, a lonely voice urging a radical change in policy. Now it is becoming more fashionable with senior figures across the political spectrum calling for the ban on cannabis to be lifted. The dramatic change in the national mood is not reflected in the Government's attitude. Ministers are being simultaneously stubborn and cautious. The timidity is reflected in their silent response to Peter Lilley's pamphlet, published on Friday, calling for the legalisation of cannabis. No minister has so far engaged in the debate with Lilley. If the Government had been surer of its case ministers would be lining up to dismiss the Conservatives' former deputy leader. Yet in spite of the meek ministerial silence, the Government is stubborn in its refusal to countenance change. This obstinacy comes at a time when the relevant laws are not even being rigorously enforced. The decision of the police in the London Borough of Lambeth not to arrest those caught with cannabis is a recent example. The situation is absurd. Smoke a joint in Brixton and you will not face arrest. Smoke a joint in Blackburn or Bourne- mouth and you can expect a swift trip down to your local police station. The Government is defending laws that are becoming discredited on the ground, placing the law as a whole in disrepute. New Labour is looking old-fashioned. The Conservatives are showing signs of a more radical approach - in the rebellious response of the Shadow Cabinet last October to Ann Widdecombe's call for even more Draconian measures against cannabis users and in Michael Portillo's suggestion that legalisation would be part of a policy review. Charles Kennedy deserves credit in calling for a commission to consider the legalisation of cannabis when he first became leader of the Liberal Democrats. But even these relatively bold politicians are too cautious. A commission is a convenient way of throwing the issue into the distance. The main obstacle to the legalisation of cannabis appears to be that it would provide a gateway to harder drugs. But our poll suggests that the vast majority of people make a distinction between smoking cannabis and taking harder drugs. Nearly all those supporting the legalisation of cannabis still want hard drugs to be banned. Indeed, nearly all cannabis users support a ban on hard drugs. In reality, legalising cannabis would make a descent into hard drugs much less likely. As Lilley argues in his pamphlet, the current situation "brings the soft-drug user into contact with the hard-drug pusher". A key objective of reforming the cannabis laws would be to break the contact between soft-drug users and the criminals who push drugs. For this reason Lilley is right to propose that cannabis is available in licensed premises. This is a preferable alternative to ad hoc police activities or the reduced penalties suggested in Lady Runciman's report last year. In either of these cases cannabis seekers would still come into contact with those selling harder drugs. Under Lilley's proposal they would come into contact with the owner of an off licence. Public opinion has shifted towards this newspaper's position over the past four years. Almost certainly, that trend will continue. Our poll finds that support for legalisation is strongest among those groups that have used cannabis or who know cannabis users. They tend to be the young and middle-aged. Soon the Sixties' generation will be pensioners. At that point the young and not so young will be united in their acquaintance with cannabis. Over the next two decades the pressure for the lifting of the ban will be overwhelming. In the more immediate future, the Government might be tempted to use a royal commission on cannabis as an excuse for doing nothing. The establishment of a commission would look radical without necessarily changing anything - a combination that Tony Blair has found appealing in the past. Mr Blair should also resist an alternative third way of legalising cannabis for medicinal purposes. That is another convenient diversion. It is time for political leaders to face up to reality. Cannabis is used for recreational purposes. While the war on hard drugs should be intensified, the Government must lift the ban on cannabis.
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!