Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Editorial: A rightly deposed tsar

The Guardian

Saturday 04 Aug 2001

---

Leader
Keith Hellawell lost his way in Whitehall

It was a defensive farewell. It needed to be. In a succession of
interviews this week, Keith Hellawell, the departing drugs tsar,
asserted he had not been a failure and insisted Britain's anti-drugs
strategy was "the envy of the world". Both assertions, alas, are wrong.
Ironically, Keith Hellawell made a much bigger contribution to drugs
policy as a chief constable - in Cleveland as well as West Yorkshire -
than as the government's chief anti-drugs campaign coordinator.

In his former role he was the first to set up a specialist drugs squad,
but was also ready to consider radical options like the
decriminalisation of cannabis, and to remind politicians that young
people enjoyed the drug.

In the second, he became the lapdog of a government that has insisted on
maintaining a hardline stance on drugs. The UK has the harshest anti-
drugs laws in Europe, while still maintaining the highest consumption of
soft and hard drugs.

Instead of challenging ministers about these contradictions - or even
supporting his immediate and more liberal political boss, Mo Mowlam, who
wanted clearer separation of soft and hard drugs - the drug tsar never
forgot who appointed him to his Cabinet Office post, Tony Blair.
Hardline became Mr Hellawell's middle name.

His biggest failure was his rejection of last year's national commission
on drug misuse - on which sat two chief constables. This documented the
degree to which the 30-year-old current British law no longer reflected
scientific, medical or sociological evidence.

He lined up with ministers in rejecting the idea of reclassifying drugs
according to their harm and paid far too little attention to the wide
variation between police forces on their cautioning policies.

By the time the new home secretary, David Blunkett, sidelined him, he
was a sad and peripheral Whitehall figure. He leaves a strategy which
still places far too much emphasis on police and customs and far too
little on treatment and education.


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!