Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Yes, it was my son says Straw. But I'm as hard-line on drugs as ever

Michael Streeter and Colin Brown

The Independent (UK)

Saturday 03 Jan 1998

Jack Straw spoke of his embarrassment
yesterday as he was finally identified as the father
of the teenager alleged to have sold drugs to a
journalist. MICHAEL STREETER and COLIN BROWN
say he will press on with his crusade against crime
and to make parents take more responsibility for
their children's actions.

The Home Secretary last night told of his "shock
and concern" after learning that his son William
faced an accusation of drug dealing after an
undercover operation by the Mirror newspaper.

Mr Straw, who has spoken privately of his
frustration over his enforced anonymity, said he
was now "very relieved" to be able to speak out
after the High Court lifted the ban on naming his
son,

He agreed that his William, aged 17, who has
been accepted for a place at Oxford University,
ought to expect no favours from the legal system,
but neither should he suffer more for being the son
of a prominent politician.

"When the Mirror first spoke to me I felt the same
emotions as any parent would do in such
circumstances - those of shock and concern.

"Being a parent means giving love and support,
and - when it's necessary - confronting children
with their wrong-doing. When a child does
wrong, I believe it to be the duty of a parent to
act promptly," Mr Straw said.

His son had gone voluntarily with him to the
police and would accept "any sanctions" which
arise. He was "of course" embarrassed by this but
it did not affect his ability to speak on law and
order matters including drugs policy. Neither he
nor Downing Street had ever considered him
resigning, and last night the Prime Minister's office
said he had Tony Blair's full support.

"I have always sought - and so have my
colleagues - to conduct our family lives the same
way as other people.

"These are experiences that other families have
had and so it does not in any way affect my ability
to talk on these matters."

The naming of Mr Straw as the father of the
arrested youth followed an agonising period in
which, day by day, the secret trickled out in every
bar England and Wales.

After what one opposition MP called "slow
torture" for Mr Straw's family, a High Court
judge, Mr Justice Toulson, lifted an injunction
which banned the media in this country from
identifying the youth.

On the day that Scottish newspapers published
the minister's identity, the judge asked "whether it
was sensible or appropriate for the court to
maintain opposition in which matters can be
published in Greenock but not in Carlisle".

His lifting of an injunction - originally granted at
the wish of the Attorney General on Tuesday
when the Sun threatened to publish - brought to
an end a period not just of uncertainty for the
Straws, but also a time of growing confusion over
the law.

Newspapers in France, Ireland and media all
around the world had revealed the identity of Mr
Straw who was not named when the Mirror
broke the story on Christmas Eve claiming that
one of their reporters had bought £10 of cannabis
from his 17-year-old son William.

William was arrested and released on police bail.
Next week the Crown Prosecution Service will
decide whether to prosecute. There are
indications that a police file sent to the CPS
believes that because of conflicts in evidence of
what happened on the night there should be no
further action, except possibly a caution for the
youth. No decision has been made yet on the
reporter who reportedly received the drugs,
Dawn Alford, who was arrested and bailed by
police on Monday.

Philip Havers QC, for the Attorney General John
Morris, had argued at a private hearing yesterday
that the injunction granted by Mr Justice Moses
on Tuesday should be continued.

But Mr Justice Toulson said when Mr Justice
Moses made his order, the identity of the boy
was not widely known and it was now common
ground that "there had been a major change of
circumstances".

The judge said a French newspaper had used the
names and they were also available on the
Internet. "The question is whether the stage has
now been reached where it would be artificial to
pretend that anonymity can be preserved. "

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!