Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Canada: Column: It's Time For Politicians To Get Off The 'Pot'

Mindelle Jacobs

Edmonton Sun (CN AB)

Sunday 25 Mar 2001

---

When the Senate appointed a special committee a year ago to review
Canada's anti-drug laws, it seemed almost too good to be true.

Academics and health professionals had been telling politicians what
Canadians have known all along - prohibition has failed.

The war on drugs has neither prevented addiction nor resulted in an
overall decrease in drug use.

On the contrary, there are more casual users, more people with drug-
related convictions and more addicts. Over the years, that has
translated into skyrocketing costs for the criminal justice system,
clogged prisons and health problems.

So it appeared, when the Senate committee was set up last April, that
the politicians were finally listening.

Alas, it was too good to be true. The committee held one day of
hearings in October before it was disbanded because of the federal
election campaign.

Last week, the Senate voted to renew the mandate of its committee on
illegal drugs. Sort of.

The committee's new role bears virtually no resemblance to the old one.

Last year, the committee was given a broad mandate to review the federal
government's policy on all illegal drugs.

As part of that study, the committee was to conduct public consultations
and develop a national harm-reduction policy to reduce the negative
consequences of illegal drug use.

Now, however, the committee is restricted to a much narrower mandate -
cannabis.

The original three-year time frame is gone. This time around, the
committee has until August 2002 to present its final report. It also
hopes to have an interim report ready within the next couple of months.

The rush to put out an interim report, of course, is because judges in
Alberta and Ontario declared Canada's pot law unconstitutional last year
because it ignores the medical use of the drug.

Both courts gave Ottawa a year to revise the law, otherwise pot
possession will be legal in Ontario and pot-growing will be permitted in
Alberta.

This is what happens when politicians dither over important public
policy issues. Marijuana should have been legalized for adult use long
ago. Although pot is not an entirely benign drug, it was government-
imposed morality - not health concerns - that led to its prohibition in
the 1920s.

If the state is so concerned about our health, why is it legal to smoke
and drink when tobacco and booze kill thousands of Canadians a year?

Committee member Senator Pierre Claude Nolin tried to put a brave face
on his team's truncated mandate last week.

Although he would have preferred that the committee examine the entire
illegal drug scene, the Senate wanted the focus on cannabis alone, he
said.

"I have to respect them even though, like I told them, we can't slice
the problem by substance," he told me.

Once the pot report is finished, the committee will reassess Canada's
laws on other illegal drugs, he added.

Nolin may be overly optimistic. As it stands now, there is no mandate
or budget to extend the review beyond the committee's look at cannabis.

Will his committee ever get the green light to explore the social and
health consequences of treating heroin and cocaine addicts as criminals?
Or will it remain an untouchable subject?

Eugene Oscapella, of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, who has
been at the forefront of the call for more humane drug laws, blames the
committee's shrunken mandate on political cowardice at a higher level.

"The only thing I can conclude is that they're afraid of the truth,"
says Oscapella, who appeared before the original Senate committee last
year.

"They're afraid of honest, accurate information that's going to chip
away at the propaganda and hypocrisy," he says.

"This committee has the potential to do really excellent work," he adds.

There's the rub. Will Ottawa let the committee do its job? Is that too
much to hope for from politicians?


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!