Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Column: It's time for plain dealing on drugs

Margo MacDonald, MSP

Edinburgh Evening News

Wednesday 16 Jan 2002

---

DO you think this new fashion for telling it like it is
amongst Tony's cronies could catch on?

First there was Foreign Office minister Peter Hain, who's
supposed to be subtly promoting the Blair line on the EU
gravy-train, going off the tracks and admitting that British
railways are the worst in Europe.

Then there was Lord Barnett, the peer formerly known as
Joel, the Treasury Minister who produced the financial
formula, or carve-up, which bears his name. He said the job
of Secretary of State for Scotland was redundant.

Is it hoping for too much, do you think, to open the paper
each morning and search for a similar true story on the
Government's policy on drug use and abuse?

Probably, because too many prominent politicians would have
to eat their words if the Home Secretary or the Health
Secretary admitted that Labour's drugs policies have failed.

Just as the railways are now seen to be providing the worst
service in Europe, so Britain has the worst record on
dealing with drug use.

The figures on drug-related crime continue to rise, prisons
are rife with all sorts of drugs, deaths from overdoses are
much higher than in continental Europe, and the age at which
drugs are first used is lower than in neighbouring
countries.

Yet the Government's strategy on drug use is confused or
secret, or both.

What is the intention in spending millions on Drugs Action
Areas, on support groups, self-help groups, school education
programmes, TV public service advertising, rehabilitation
units and publicly-funded organisations like Scotland
Against Drugs?

Is the aim to obliterate all drug use, including alcohol and
tobacco, or is there a level of tolerable drug use, once
again including booze and baccy?

One thing's become more obvious since poor Prince Hal's
admission of being a regular sort of guy. It's not only
young people who judge booze to be a bigger danger to the
achievement of health and happiness.

The reaction to the news of the young prince's drinking and
cannabis use has shown that parents are more concerned about
the effects of drink.

As you'd expect from this government of cutting-edge
thinkers, now that there's less possibility of a parents'
revolt at the polls should cannabis be re-classified, David
Blunkett has led from behind . . . and placed responsibility
on the police officer on the beat for determining whether
someone caught in possession of cannabis should be
cautioned, and have his or her supply confiscated, or
arrested and charged with having the intent to supply
others.

Emboldened by this piece of buck-passing, the Home Secretary
is now reported to be open to the suggestion by the
Association of Senior Police Officers in England and Wales
that people caught in possession of heroin, cocaine and
Ecstasy should not be prosecuted as at present, but should
be given the option of rehabilitative treatment.

So far, so nearly good. The two weak points are firstly,
that it's a bad move to make police officers act as judge
and jury or decide who should be charged, and who should
walk free.

Secondly, even though imprisonment is unsuitable, there
aren't nearly enough treatment centres to cope with people
who would be jailed under the present policy.

Drug classification is a power that's reserved for
Westminster, but policing and health policies are the
responsibility of the Scottish Parliament. Through political
cowardice, Westminster probably won't reclassify any drugs
apart from cannabis, if that. The result of that will be to
prolong the strategy-free limbo of the present laws on drug
use.

I'm still trying to persuade my fellow MSPs to have a
commission set up by the parliament to investigate drug use
in Scotland so that we can agree on some strategic aims
against which the millions spent on combating drugs could be
measured.

Without knowing why Prince Harry, or the vast majority of
the teenagers in our own families, don't progress to hard
drugs, and in most cases, stop using drugs other than
alcohol, it's impossible to construct a workable policy for
coping with drugs, to avoid the law looking like an ass and
the rest of we social drug-takers looking like hypocrites.


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!