|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
UK: Smoke wisdom
Leader The Guardian
Tuesday 12 Nov 2002 Stay cool about cannabis dangers Leader Bill Clinton - "I puffed, but I didn't inhale" - was wiser than he knew. A new report from the British Lung Foundation, based on 90 published research studies, suggests that three cannabis joints a day can cause the same damage to the lining of the lungs as 20 cigarettes; and that cannabis cigarettes contain 50% more cancer-causing carcinogens than tobacco, depositing four times as much tar on the respiratory tract as unfiltered cigarettes of the same weight. The new report says research studies carried out in the 1960s and 1970s showing the relative harmlessness of cannabis have been overtaken by the more potent forms of cannabis smoked today. The typical joint now has 15 times as much THC, the ingredient which accounts for the psychoactive properties of the drug, than 30 years ago. We also know more about the differences between smoking cannabis and tobacco: the puff volume is two thirds as high; inhalation one third as high; and breath-holding four times as long. So where does this leave the government's plan to downgrade cannabis from a B to a C category of harmfulness? Unchanged - for three reasons. First, because the new research ignores the pattern of use. For the majority, cannabis use remains recreational and irregular. Most users do not smoke three joints a day. Second, the drug's current level of illegality (and price) dictates its consumption method: mixed with tobacco to make it look like a normal smoke. The new approach - a caution rather than arrest - would encourage more use of hookahs, which would reduce many of the drug's dangers. Third, the social reasons for the reclassification still stand up: it remains far less dangerous than heroin, cocaine and crack; it diverts enormous amounts of police time; and it threatens its 2.5 million young users with a criminal record. Serious reformers never denied the drug was risk-free. Let the new risks be widely publicised, but not prompt a new war on its users.
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!