|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
UK: UN attacks Blunkett's new cannabis law
Alan Travis, home affairs editor The Guardian
Wednesday 26 Feb 2003 Reclassification 'undermining Africa's efforts to curb drugs' Britain's decision to relax the cannabis laws has led to "worldwide repercussions" including undermining African efforts to curb cultivation of the illicit plant, a UN drug agency claims. The International Narcotics Control Board, which is charged with enforcing the treaties that ban drugs, says it is concerned at David Blunkett's decision to reclassify cannabis, because it "sends the wrong signal" to the rest of the world. The INCB's Nigerian president, Philip Emafo, says in its annual report published today: "It is important that consensus prevails in international drug control. No government should take unilateral measures without considering the impact of its actions and ultimately the consequences for an entire system that took governments almost a century to establish." The report says the home secretary's decision "could lead to increased cultivation of cannabis destined for the UK and other European countries". A conference held by African law enforcement agencies in Nairobi in September was told that Mr Blunkett's decision would "undermine the efforts of governments of African countries to counter illicit cannabis cultivation, trafficking, and abuse". The INCB report claims there is "widespread confusion and misunderstanding" of the policy, with most British schoolchildren believing cannabis is now legal or even some type of medicine. The reclassification had also caused confusion among other countries over Britain's attitude towards the international drug laws. The INCB conceded yesterday that Mr Blunkett's limited move, meaning simple possession of cannabis will no longer be an arrestable offence for most drug users, did not amount to legalisation and did not violate any international treaties. Indeed the prohibitionist UN agency goes much further in attacking the Swiss government's proposals that the prosecution of cannabis offences will no longer be a priority, as it would not be compatible with drug control treaties. Hamid Ghodse, an INCB member and professor of pyschiatry at London University, also claimed yesterday the UK's relaxed law could in 10 or 20 years' time result in Britain's psychiatric hospitals being filled with people who have problems with cannabis. In his annual report Mr Emafo not only attacks the "missionary zeal" of those who support legalisation, but also criticises the "harm reduction" policies of most Western European countries, arguing that they amount to "proclaiming that there are safe ways to abuse drugs". A Home Office spokesman rejected the charge that the policy amounted to decriminalisation, or that the policy was confused: "It does make clear the distinction between cannabis and class A drugs such as heroin and crack cocaine, which are the drugs that cause the most harm and tear apart our communities." A British drugs charity, DrugScope, also criticised the UN report as flawed. Its chief executive, Roger Howard, said: "Throughout Europe, Australasia and Canada, scientific experts and a growing number of politicians agree that very strict regimes for cannabis cause more harm to society than the harm caused by the substance itself."
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!