Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: One war or another: It's bongs over Baghdad

Ben Rayner

Toronto Star, Canada

Sunday 02 Mar 2003

---

It must have been heartening for every American bunkered down behind
duct-taped doors and windows, nervously awaiting a smallpox outbreak or
mustard-gas attack, to see their federal authorities could still find
time away from the arduous task of combating international terrorism
last week to fight a new bogeyman: the bong.

The War on Drugs needs a little sexing up for the public eye every so
often, something to distract the populace from the fact that it's been a
dismal failure from the perspective of everyone but the thriving U.S.
prison industry.

When the War on Terror threatened to steal what was left of its flagging
thunder, for instance, anti-drug forces responded by linking the two and
warning narcotics consumers that the money they spend on recreational
pharmaceuticals could potentially be trickling back into the hands of
terrorist organizations.

"If you get high, kids, the terrorists win," was the message - coming,
rather unfairly, at a time when a lot of fearful people are feeling an
uncommonly strong urge to do just that. Drug users were no longer just
immoral human beings and criminals to be pitied and incarcerated en
masse. No, the stoners were bringing the country down from within.

Now, in what can only be seen as a rather wobbly attempt to save face in
a long, losing battle, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency is crying
"victory" in a whole new conflict spun off from the War on Drugs, one
we'll dub the War on Drug Paraphernalia.

The DEA made a proud announcement this past week that it had snared 55
individuals in countrywide raids on businesses allegedly manufacturing,
importing and selling bongs, pipes, scales and other varieties of
"illegal drug paraphernalia."

Amidst all the "that's one for the good guys" back-slapping and alarmist
rhetoric emanating from the various law-enforcement agencies involved,
however, there was no mention of anything being done to physically curb
the actual drug trade that enables the paraphernalia business to take in
an estimated $50 million (U.S.) in the States annually.

At the end of the day, "Operation Pipe Dreams," as the crackdown was
creatively named, did nothing more than screw up the lives and
livelihoods of several dozen entrepreneurs and provide the authorities
with an elaborate media stunt to disguise the fact that they're not
doing their real job.

Inventing a problem is always a handy political tool for manipulating
public opinion and diverting attention from the numerous things you're
not doing. We've seen the same tactic at work here in Toronto numerous
times - when former Ontario education minister John Snobelen got caught
musing about "creating a crisis" to ram the Harris government's school
reforms through the provincial Legislature, for example, or when the
Toronto police force made somewhat spurious claims about seizing guns at
raves three years ago to exaggerate the (virtually non-existent) dangers
of the after-hours party scene and hasten a clampdown.

America must be resting a little easier tonight, now that it's dealt
with all those Graffix bongs, tiny coke spoons and crack pipes - the
latter's not a hot seller, I suspect, since committed crackheads are
more likely to shoplift a pipe or crudely fashion one from a discarded
can than they are to walk into a head shop and say, "Hello, might I have
a look at your selection of crack pipes, please?" What a crippling blow
to the drug trade. Surely the demand for marijuana and blow will dry up
now that no one has any means of ingesting them. This War on Drugs is
winnable, after all!

"People selling drug paraphernalia are in essence no different from drug
dealers," was DEA chief John Brown's ludicrous statement to the press.
"They are as much a part of drug trafficking as silencers are a part of
criminal homicide."

No different from drug dealers, that is, except they don't deal drugs.
And, if we're to be picky about the structure of Brown's second
statement, wouldn't it be more accurate to relate dealers of drug
paraphernalia to those who supply murderers with the "paraphernalia" of
criminal homicide - gun dealers, let's say - rather than silencers? A
silencer is more akin to a roach clip or a glass bowl for a bong; it's
an accessory, a tool of the trade. But, I suppose, following logic on
this matter might imply some justification for an America-wide crackdown
on weapons manufacturers, distributors and retailers, and that's not
coming anytime soon.

As usual, puritanical U.S. Attorney-General John Ashcroft found a way to
foment middle-class panic by noting that a dozen of the businesses
raided were Internet operations that "in some cases" had been targeting
"young people" with their products (smart business, really, since young
people tend to do the most drugs).

"The illegal drug-paraphernalia industry has invaded the homes of
families across the country without their knowledge," he cautioned,
employing the same sort of broadly generalized non-reasoning favoured by
his colleagues in the DEA. One would think, after all, that anyone
ordering a freebase kit from an online retailer is well aware that the
illegal drug-paraphernalia industry has "invaded" - or, rather, been
invited into - his or her home.

The Internet angle is nevertheless a convenient, subtle way of implying
a need for stricter monitoring of cyberspace, which - if we're to
believe the news - is already a minefield of perverts, child
pornographers and con artists preying on our "young people." And, as we
all know, governments these days are all hot and bothered about
monitoring everything and everyone. For the greater good, of course.

It's all - to use a vaguely drug-related idiom - smoke and mirrors, an
empty triumph of law and order over a symptomatic "evil" that wouldn't
exist had a much larger problem been dealt with sanely and efficiently
in the first place. Create a crisis and proclaim yourself a hero, while
changing nothing.

If I weren't already so tired of talking about the States, I'd say that
sounds awfully familiar.
----
brayner@thestar.ca

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!