Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Bill Allows Medical Marijuana Defense in Drug Cases

Todd Zwillich

Reuters

Thursday 10 Apr 2003

---

WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) - U.S. lawmakers have launched an effort
that would allow defendants from states with legalized medical marijuana
to use "medical necessity" as a defense against federal drug charges.

A bill introduced in the U.S. House Thursday and backed by pro-medical
marijuana groups would apply to California and seven other states where
medical marijuana is legal. The measure gives defendants accused of
growing or distributing marijuana in violation of federal drug laws the
right to inform juries that they were acting legally in their state.

Supporters touted the proposal as a way to protect the democratic
process in states where voters or legislators approve measures backing
medical marijuana.

"This is about due process. It's not about pot," said Rep. Sam Farr,
D-Calif., who co-authored the measure with Rep. Dana Rohrbacher,
R-Calif.

The bill was motivated by the conviction of Ed Rosenthal, an
Oakland-based marijuana activist who was found guilty in January of
violating federal drug laws.

Rosenthal was licensed by Oakland to grow and distribute cannabis under
a California medical marijuana statute, but the judge in his case
prevented Rosenthal's attorney from informing the jury that the action
was legal in that state.

Marney Craig, who was a juror in Rosenthal's case, said that she
regretted voting to convict him. During the case, jurors were only
informed that Rosenthal grew marijuana and not that he had been licensed
to do so.

"We rendered a verdict that was wrong. We convicted a man who was not
criminal," Craig said.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2001 that "medical necessity" cannot be
used as a valid defense against federal marijuana charges. Thursday's
proposal would change a key part of the federal Controlled Substances
Act to allow state laws to become a factor in federal drug cases.

Seven other states -- Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, Nevada,
Colorado, and Maine -- have laws similar to California's. Maryland has a
proposed medical marijuana law pending. Voters in the District of
Columbia also approved a medical marijuana referendum several years ago,
though the Congress has prevented local officials from implementing the
measure.

Federal anti-drug officials remain vehemently opposed to efforts to
spread legalized medical marijuana throughout the states. John Walters,
the director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy
(ONDCP), has campaigned heavily against legalization referenda in
several states.

Dr. Andrea Barthwell, ONDCP's deputy director for demand reduction, said
that the bill threatens to undermine federal drug laws that are in place
to protect public health, even if voters in some states have spoken
differently.

"We recognize that federal law trumps state law in this area," she said
in an interview.

The bill's chances of passing in the Republican-controlled House are
likely to hinge on support from GOP members from the handful of states
where medical marijuana is allowed.

Some Republicans have backed the bill on the grounds that it helps
prevent the federal government from intruding on state laws.

But it remained unclear Thursday how many GOP members would support the
bill. Rep. David Dryer, R-Calif., said in an interview that he backs
states' rights "in general," but that he has not yet taken a position on
the bill.

Rep. Mary Bono, another California Republican, said that she has yet to
see the bill's details. "I think that if the state has spoken, then I'd
want to support the state on that," she said.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!