Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Cannabis Policy Goes Up In Smoke

Sophie Goodchild

Independent on Sunday

Sunday 22 Jun 2003

---

Chief constables are refusing to sanction new proposals that reduce police
powers of arrest against cannabis smokers in a rebellion against the
Government.

The hardline approach by members of the Association of Chief Police
Officers (Acpo) is expected to lead to huge differences in how cannabis is
policed in Britain.

It will also cause a schism between regional police forces and the
Metropolitan Police, which intends to back plans by David Blunkett, the
Home Secretary, for officers to arrest cannabis users only in exceptional
circumstances.

Last year, Mr Blunkett announced that he planned to downgrade cannabis from
a class B to a class C drug, effectively allowing it to be smoked for
personal use. He took the decision in part to ensure that police forces
targeted their overstretched resources towards hard drugs.

But the Home Secretary was forced into partial retreat. After fierce
lobbying by senior police officers, he announced new laws enabling police
to retain the power of arrest for cannabis possession as well as a 14-year
sentence for dealers.

These new powers are contained in the Criminal Justice Bill, which is
likely to gain Royal Assent later this year.

Andy Hayman, chairman of Acpo's drugs committee and the Chief Constable of
Norfolk, battled to persuade other chief constables to accept a
three-strikes-and-you're-out policy, but this was rejected on the grounds
that it would be too difficult for officers to monitor users.

At a meeting of chief constables next month he will attempt to push through
a watered-down strategy proposing arrest in specific circumstances, for
example where users have been found in possession outside schools. But
chief constables of individual forces have argued they must be allowed to
decide when to make arrests.

A police insider said that the different approaches in policing towards
cannabis will send "all sorts of mixed messages" to users.

"Chief constables have said that Parliament or the Government cannot tell a
constable when and why they exercise their discretion. It's a matter for
the officer concerned," the source said.

An Independent on Sunday survey of half of British police forces on how
they treated cannabis users over the last financial year shows remarkable
discrepancies and indicates that the system is in chaos. The number of
people cautioned by Cleveland Police for possessing class B drugs, for
example, increased from 117 in 2001 to 186 in 2002. This compares with
Essex Police where there was a much smaller rise - from 411 in 2001 to 441
in 2002.

"There is major confusion going on," said Roger Howard, chief executive of
drugs charity Drugscope. "Our advice would be for the police to let go of
this issue and to let the Home Secretary do what he intended in the first
place and not have arrestability."



 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!