Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Alaska: Judge Dismisses Pot Conviction

Dan Rice, Staff Writer

Fairbanks Daily News-Miner (US)

Friday 04 Jul 2003

---

A Fairbanks judge ruled the Alaska Constitution guarantees a local man the
right to possess marijuana for personal use in his home. In a decision
rendered last week, Superior Court Judge Richard Savell dismissed the
Fairbanks man's conviction for pot possession, ruling that a 1975 Alaska
Supreme Court decision legalizing personal marijuana use by an adult in
their home is still the law.

Savell agreed with arguments made by an attorney for Scott A. Thomas, 42,
who was charged with three counts of felony fourth-degree misconduct
involving a controlled substance for allegedly growing pot plants in a
Tonsina Drive residence last summer.

The case went to trial in May and the jury found Thomas guilty of one count
of a misdemeanor charge of sixth-degree misconduct involving a controlled
substance for possessing 2.6 ounces of marijuana.

Lawyer Bill Satterberg immediately filed a motion for Savell to dismiss the
guilty verdict based on an argument that the law under which Thomas was
convicted was not constitutional as determined by the controversial 1975
state Supreme Court decision made in Ravin v. State.

The decision made it legal for adults to possess marijuana in their homes
for personal consumption as long as the amount of the drug didn't exceed
enough to constitute "an intent to deliver."

Four ounces of marijuana or more was considered the intent to deliver
threshold when the decision became part of the state's criminal code, but
state law has since placed the amount at eight ounces.

The justices ruled in Ravin that possession of pot by an adult in their home
was allowed as a fundamental constitutional right to privacy. However, a
1990 voter initiative changed state law to make possession of any amount of
marijuana in any location illegal.

In Thomas' recent case, the defense argued that the portion of the law
prohibiting possession of marijuana for personal consumption by an adult in
their home is unconstitutional.

"A direct conflict in the law exists between the right to privacy guaranteed
under the Alaska Constitution and the statutory prohibition ... which
criminalizes the personal use of marijuana by an adult in the privacy of the
home, regardless of the quantity of the prohibited substance," reads a
portion of Thomas' motion to dismiss his conviction.

Savell granted the motion on June 25, writing in pen under his signature of
approval that "Ravin stands."

Jim McLain, a legal clerk in Satterberg's law office who drafted the motion
for dismissal, called the decision significant.

"My understanding of it is that if Ravin is still the law, then marijuana is
still legal," said McLain, a former attorney.

He said Savell's decision does not necessarily set precedent, "although in
reality it may be indicative of what other judges in Fairbanks do."

McLain added that he expects a more broad-scale debate to develop soon about
whether Alaska's marijuana possession law is constitutional. McLain said he
believes that the 1990 voter initiative that criminalized all pot use in the
state is not binding, considering voters do not have the power to change the
constitution through the initiative process.

In a 1998 Alaska Law Review article that McLain included in his motion,
author Andrew Winters also argued that Alaskans have a constitutional right
to possess marijuana in their homes.

"Ultimately, the limited actual enforcement of private marijuana possession
means both Ravin and the initiative that attempted to invalidate it have a
great deal of symbolic value. Ravin is a symbol that Alaska should be proud
to endorse, a symbol of the value that Alaska places on personal autonomy,"
Winters wrote in his conclusion.

It's possible that the District Attorney's Office could appeal Savell's
decision. The Distract Attorney assigned to the case was not in his office
Thursday and unavailable for comment.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!