Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

US: Marijuana Does Not Cause Reckless Driving

Mitch Earleywine, Ph.D.

Drugsense.org

Friday 26 Sep 2003

---

The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and
certain Wisconsin legislators have launched a new crusade against
"drugged driving," with a heavy emphasis on marijuana. This crusade is
largely based on scientific misinformation, and it could lead to the
enactment of bad laws.

ONDCP has several slick television commercials on the subject. One
shows dramatic auto accidents and two crash test dummies passing a
joint while a serious voice says, "In a recent study, one in three
reckless drivers tested positive for marijuana." Note the careful
phrasing. The idea is to make viewers think that marijuana caused the
reckless driving, without really saying that it did.

Why would ONDCP be so coy? The answer lies in the actual data
regarding marijuana's effects on driving,

I study the effects of drugs and teach classes in the science of
illicit substances, so I know this field. The plain fact is that
marijuana does not cause reckless driving. Large studies of accidents
show that drivers who test positive for marijuana (and ONLY marijuana
-- i.e., people who haven't also been drinking or taking other
intoxicating drugs) cause fewer crashes than people who haven't had
any drugs at all.

That's right, people "high" on marijuana cause fewer crashes than
those who are completely sober. The findings seemed impossible to
explain. It was a puzzle that made no sense.

A bright and talented researcher in the Netherlands named Robbe
recently solved that puzzle. He got experienced marijuana users stoned
and had them drive around the streets of Holland. But these guys were
no dummies. They drove slower, increased the distance between their
cars and the cars in front of them, and never tried to pass other
cars. Folks who smoked a placebo (a non-intoxicating substance made to
look and smell like marijuana) drove as they usually did. Alcohol,
alone or in combination with marijuana, wrecked driving completely.

Robbe's results helped explain the accident studies. People who used
marijuana and only marijuana were compensating for the drug's effects
by driving more carefully. Nobody should drive high, but we can all
take a lesson from these people who did: slow down, leave space
between your car and the next, and don't try to pass. Unlike alcohol,
which makes people behave recklessly, marijuana users tend to be aware
that they are impaired and compensate with some success.

But what about the ONDCP's claim that one in three reckless drivers
tested positive for marijuana?

It's not quite a lie, but it's deliberately misleading. The Drug
Czar's no dummy. He wants to scare people, and he knows the complete
facts won't do it. Instead he throws out scary but incomplete and
misleading statistics -- and hopes people won't question them. Yes,
one in three reckless drivers tested positive for marijuana in a urine
screen, but we don't know how many of them had alcohol,
antihistamines, cocaine, or any number of other drugs in their
systems.

Legislators need to ask for the complete facts behind the scare
stories before they start passing new laws based on misinformation.

There are cheaper, easier ways to get impaired drivers off the road.
Roadside sobriety tests are reliable, inexpensive, and valid
indicators of impaired driving. Law-enforcement officers can learn to
administer these tests quickly and easily. Unlike expensive blood
tests, which can only identify a few drugs, roadside sobriety tests
can detect any kind of drug impairment that might hurt driving. People
who've had too many antihistamines can't drive well. Roadside sobriety
tests would keep them off the road. A blood test would let them drive
on by.

Don't be a dummy. Insist on roadside sobriety tests instead of
expensive, misleading blood tests.

Mitch Earleywine, Ph.D., is an associate professor of psychology at
the University of Southern California and author of "Understanding
Marijuana" (Oxford University Press, 2002).

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!