Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

Canada: Court eases medical marijuana rules, reinstates law

Jake Rupert

The Ottawa Citizen

Wednesday 08 Oct 2003

---

Those with permits must have access to drug: judges

An Ontario Court of Appeal ruling has theoretically made it easier for
medical marijuana users to safely get a good supply of the drug.

But the court yesterday reinstated the law against everyone else possessing
small amounts of cannabis for recreational use.

The court dismissed an appeal by the federal Justice Department of a lower
court ruling that found Health Canada's Marijuana Medical Access
Regulations were unconstitutional.

It said the regulations didn't provide a reliable source of marijuana for
sick people with government permits to smoke the drug for medical purposes.

The judges also changed the medical marijuana regulations in four
fundamental ways.

Justices David Doherty, Stephen Goudge and Janet Simmons struck down the
regulations against sick people paying designated growers for marijuana,
designated growers supplying more than one sick person, and growers banding
together to grow the drug.

They also struck down a requirement that people suffering from ailments
other than cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis needed two specialists to
prescribe the drug before an exemption would be granted.

The court said growers still had to get a licence from Health Canada, and
the government could put further restrictions on the growers. In theory,
this paves the way for the legalization of "compassion clubs," which grow
marijuana for a number of sick people who pay for the drug. Many of these
organizations operate illegally in Canada already.

The other major part of the court's ruling deals with simple possession of
marijuana by people without exemptions.

In January, a judge declared the law against simple possession of marijuana
didn't exist in Ontario because a previous court of appeal ruling said the
possession law would be invalid by July 2001 if the government didn't
create a constitutionally sound exemption. The government did not do this.

The judge acquitted a person who was charged with possession of marijuana,
saying the law didn't exist. The Justice Department appealed this finding.

Yesterday, the court agreed with the lower court ruling that there has been
no law against possession of marijuana since July 2001. However, it said
that because it has now changed the medical marijuana access regulations to
make them constitutional, the simple possession law is reinstated.

The ruling creates a quandary for justice officials. The court clearly held
that the law against possession in Ontario has been void since July 2001.

This means hundreds of people have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to
breaking a law that didn't exist.

The Justice Department will now have to decide what to do with cases put on
hold pending this ruling.

Copyright 2003 The Ottawa Citizen



 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!