|
Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:
|
|
US DC: Law Overturned Barring Marijuana Vote In DC
ccguide Friday 29 Mar 2002 Pubdate: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 Source: Washington Post (DC) Page: B01 Copyright: 2002 The Washington Post Company Contact: Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/491 Author: Arthur Santana, Washington Post Staff Writer Cited: Marijuana Policy Project http://www.mpp.org/ Related: http://www.mpp.org/lawsuit/announcement.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) LAW OVERTURNED BARRING MARIJUANA VOTE IN D.C. A federal judge in Washington yesterday overturned a law prohibiting D.C. residents from circulating or voting on a ballot initiative to legalize marijuana for medical purposes, clearing the way for the measure to be put on the ballot, possibly as early as November. Proponents of the medical use of marijuana went to court in December seeking an injunction barring enforcement of the federal law, which effectively blocked D.C. residents from putting the issue before voters. The ban was enacted by Congress in 1998 after an identical legalization initiative was placed on the ballot and set off a home rule confrontation with federal lawmakers. If 16,000 valid signatures are collected and certified by July 5, the medical marijuana initiative could be on the November ballot -- although the timeline is tight. If D.C. voters support it as they have in the past, the nation's capital would become the ninth U.S. jurisdiction to abolish criminal sanctions for those who use marijuana for medicinal purposes. The measure would legalize the cultivation, possession, use and distribution of marijuana for seriously ill patients whose physicians recommend its use. The prohibition against letting D.C. voters consider legalizing marijuana was known as the Barr Amendment. It was named after its sponsor, Rep. Robert L. Barr Jr. (R-Ga.), who attached an annual rider to the District's appropriation bill that prevented public funds from being used to put the issue on any city ballot. In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan called the ban unconstitutional, saying it attempted to permanently prohibit legalization advocates, organized as the Marijuana Policy Project, from circulating a petition to get the measure on the ballot. "There can be no doubt that the Barr Amendment restricts plaintiff's First Amendment right to engage in political speech," Sullivan wrote. Initiative 59, the 1998 ballot measure, was approved by 69 percent of the D.C. electorate, although proponents had to go to court before election officials were allowed to count the vote nearly a year later. The measure passed in every precinct of the city's eight wards. Barr issued a statment yesterday vowing to continue his fight against legalizing the drug in the District. "Clearly, the court today has ignored the constitutional right and responsibility of Congress to pass laws protecting citizens from dangerous and addictive narcotics," he said. "This initiative was about opening the door to drug legalization, and whether federal taxpayer dollars should be used to support a drug legalization agenda." A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice said government lawyers have not decided whether they will appeal Sullivan's decision. Robert Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project and a plaintiff in the case, said the ruling "means that we will be placing a question on the ballot this November to remove criminal penalties for seriously ill people who use and grow their own medical marijuana in our nation's capital." He said advocacy groups hope to begin the signature-gathering process among registered voters by the end of April. But Wayne Turner, who led the effort to get Initiative 59 on the ballot, said the measure might not make the November ballot, because the D.C. Board of Elections must hold a series of hearings on any proposed initiative and settle on its exact language. He said the board, which meets once a month, might not get the petition forms ready until July. With a July 5 deadline, "I don't see it possible" to make the November ballot, Turner said. Alexei M. Silverman, an attorney for the Marijuana Policy Project, agreed it would be a challenge. "But based on the results of the 1998 vote, we have reason to be very optimistic that odds are that it will get on the ballot," Silverman said. Proponents of medicinal marijuana cite the drug's usefulness in alleviating pain associated with AIDS, multiple sclerosis, cancer and other diseases. But the White House's national drug policy office and several medical associations say the evidence of those benefits is not conclusive enough to merit a change in the law. Many members of Congress have said such use sends a conflicting signal about the nation's war on drugs. The elections board ruled in December that Barr's amendment prohibited the panel from doing preliminary work toward putting another marijuana initiative on this year's ballot. That decision prompted the lawsuit, which named the U.S. and D.C. governments as defendants. "Just because Congress has the authority to determine and overturn the laws of the District doesn't mean that Congress can pass unconstitutional laws," Kampia said, praising the judge's ruling. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager
After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.
|
This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!