Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: MP attacks soft drug law reform plan

Michael McHugh

The Belfast Telegraph

Friday 31 Oct 2003

---

RADICAL legislation allowing the possession of cannabis and other soft
drugs is being rushed through parliament without considering its impact on
the paramilitary drugs trade, a Northern Ireland MP has warned.

Lady Sylvia Hermon was speaking after a one-and-a-half hour debate on the
amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill in the House of Commons.

She spoke in opposition to measures which would make possession of small
amounts of cannabis for private use a non-arrestable offence and based much
of her concern on the criminal cartels which run the drug trade in the
province.

"Cannabis remains the drug of choice, with 66% of drug users on it in the
UK as a whole," she said.

"In Northern Ireland cannabis dealing is used by the paramilitary
organisations to fund their illegal activities and give their members a
very lavish lifestyle.

"I wanted the minister Caroline Flint to explain to the house what
consultations she has had with the relevant authorities in Northern Ireland
but she hedged her bets."

Lady Hermon, the wife of retired RUC Chief Constable Sir John Hermon, said
she was shocked that only 90 minutes were allocated to debate the UK-wide
change, being drawn up by the Home Office.

"The government whips should not have reduced the time allotted for debate
on this issue to an hour-and-a-half.

"This is about legalising cannabis use in the UK and yet most of the
afternoon was taken up by private members bills," she added.

The amendment also contains proposals for tougher sentencing of those
caught supplying the drug and the Home Office minister pointed that out in
her speech yesterday.

Cannabis' status would be downgraded to Class C when it becomes law.

Lady Hermon said she was disappointed that the minister did not confirm the
views of the law enforcement agencies which she believed would have backed
up her opposition to the move.

The drug is believed to have beneficial medical properties to sufferers of
chronic pain and advocates of relaxing the law have argued that cannabis
use is too widespread to successfully combat through the justice system.


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!