Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: A new leaf?

Ian Johnston & Murdo MacLeod

Scotland on Sunday

Sunday 25 Jan 2004

---

ON Thursday at 4pm, history will be made. Scotland's first cannabis cafe
will open its doors to acclaim from a crowd of assorted 'stoners', ageing
hippies and even a few trendy middle-class professionals.

But at 4.01pm an officer of the law will step in to bring an abrupt halt to
the celebrations and arrest cafe owner Paul Stewart.

The former greasy spoon in Leith has been renamed Purple Haze and painted
in the same colour in preparation for the day when cannabis is downgraded
from a class B to a class C drug. But the reefer revolution promises to be
short-lived, with Scottish police making it clear they intend to take a
radically tougher approach than their colleagues south of the Border.

Across England and Wales, there will be a presumption against arrest for
those found with smaller amounts of the drug for personal use, and officers
will usually turn a blind eye to those caught smoking a joint in private
places.

Several cannabis cafes have already opened, only being shut down when
harder drug use has been identified.

In advance of the reclassification, advice handed out by the Metropolitan
Police instructs officers in London to "presume against arresting people in
possession of a small amount of cannabis... unless there are aggravating
circumstances".

But in Scotland, such Dutch-style tolerance has been ruled out by First
Minister Jack McConnell, and ministers will this week launch a UKP50,000
advertising campaign - 'Cannabis. Remember it's still illegal'- designed to
get the message across that reclassification means very little in practice.

Tom Wood, deputy chief constable of Lothian and Borders Police, said the
Purple Haze experiment would not be allowed to last for long. "If a
cannabis cafe opens in this force area, there will be a police operation to
prosecute those behind it," he said. "That will happen, and happen very,
very quickly. I'm unequivocal about that.

"I have spoken to some of these people and a lot of them have genuine
beliefs. I said, 'I appreciate what you're saying, but here is the law and
in my role of law enforcement I will come along and arrest you if you go
ahead with this.'"

A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland said:
"It is important to emphasise that possession of cannabis remains an
arrestable offence. The Scottish police service will continue to report any
person found in possession of cannabis to the procurator fiscal."

Ironically, the downgrading of cannabis by Home Secretary David Blunkett
seems to have hardened the approach of Scottish police after five years in
which, by common consent, they all but abandoned the fight against soft drugs.

That change began in the late 1990s as part of a hard-headed approach to
focus resources on harder drugs such as heroin and crack cocaine.

One drugs officer told Scotland on Sunday: "No-one decided that we didn't
care about cannabis any more. But where there is a choice, we will go for
the hard drugs, which cause the most damage, rather than softer drugs."

Another experienced officer said: "In 99 times out of 100, people being
brought in for cannabis offences have been picked up because officers were
looking for something else. It would be very rare nowadays for police to
target or investigate anyone solely because of a suspicion of doing cannabis."

The change in policy is borne out by the statistics on drug seizures: in
1998, Scottish officers captured UKP42.9m worth of class B drugs, mostly
cannabis and amphetamines, and UKP2.3m worth of class A drugs; in 1999,
they seized UKP16.4m of hard drugs and just UKP4.5m of soft drugs. New
figures released by the Scottish Executive also show a significant fall in
cannabis convictions in the same period: in 1999, 3,485 people were
convicted in cases involving the drug; by 2000 this had fallen by 12% to 3,074.

This softer approach by those enforcing the law was also followed in
England and was one of the major reasons given by Blunkett when he took the
pragmatic decision to reclassify cannabis,

a move which exposed him to criticism on both sides of the Border.

Dr Ian Oliver, former chief constable of Grampian Police and now a United
Nations consultant on drugs control, was scathing. He said: "The mixed
message he's sent out is atrocious. In some places, kids think cannabis is
a medicine and it's all right to use. I think Blunkett wanted to appear a
bit liberal and as a 'with-it'Home Secretary."

Oliver welcomed the "sensible" decision taken in Scotland to carry on as
usual. "Parents that smoked it in the 1960s think it didn't do them any
harm, but the average potency of cannabis is something like ten times what
it was then. It's a completely different commodity. It's a horrendous
drug," he said.

Many health experts back that view. Robin Murray, head of psychiatry at the
Institute of Psychiatry, claimed up to 80% of all new psychotic cases in
inner-city areas involved a history of cannabis use, and warned that
teenage users were seven times more likely to develop psychosis, delusional
episodes or manic depression.

An English coroner warned that cannabis was a significant contributory
factor in about ten out of 100 deaths he dealt with, while others pointed
to a study of 268 murderers in America, which found that nearly a quarter
committed their crime while under the influence of cannabis.

The British Lung Foundation said three cannabis joints a day caused the
same amount of damage as a packet of cigarettes, and the British Medical
Association warned that chronic cannabis smoking significantly increased
the risk of heart disease, lung cancer, bronchitis and emphysema.

Dr Bill O'Neill, the Scottish secretary of the BMA, said: "Long-term use of
cannabis has damaging psychological consequences and it is well-documented
that it contains high quantities of the toxins and carcinogens found in
cigarettes.

"We acknowledge that it is not as dangerous as the likes of crack cocaine
or heroin, but it is still extremely toxic. We want it made clear that it
is still very harmful."

Defenders of cannabis agree there are risks, but claim they are smaller
than those associated with alcohol and tobacco. Publisher Kevin Williamson,
the Scottish Socialist Partys drugs spokesman, said

: "The only way forward for those who want the law changed is to challenge
it outwith the law. It's completely irresponsible to criminalise someone
for something that's less dangerous than alcohol. In Scotland, we're
getting treated as second-class citizens."

However, Williamson admitted that cannabis smokers were not likely to be
particularly responsive to a call to arms. "They are not always the best
section of the public to get up off their backsides," he said.

Biz Ivol is perhaps the only person in Scotland officially allowed to grow
cannabis and smoke it. She became a cause celebre last year after she was
charged in connection with allegations that she made cannabis-laced
chocolates and sent them to fellow multiple sclerosis sufferers.

But after a series of delays the Crown finally decided to drop the case in
July and it is unlikely that fresh proceedings will be brought, even though
Ivol has continued to grow and use the drug, which she says is the only
thing that relieves her symptoms.

"The last time I had any police in the house, I asked them if they wanted
to measure how big my plants were," she said.

"They sort of looked and turned away. God knows how many police have been
here over the last few months, but there have been plants growing
everywhere and they have just ignored them.

"One policeman said to me, 'I hate to say this to you, but I think you've
won this battle.'I had a bumper crop last year and I think I had every slug
in Orkney round. They were the happiest and most laid-back slugs you ever
saw. I had to get them off with a fire shovel."

Ivol, 55, who is confined to a wheelchair and needs help in order to eat,
dress, go to bed and get up, is distinctly unimpressed by the decision to
reclassify cannabis. "This just makes things even more complicated," she
said. "I don't understand it. I don't know whether they understand it
themselves. I don't know why they won't just allow us to use it to relieve
the pain. I have cannabis here in the house, I smoke a joint every night to
cope with the pain and help myself sleep. What are they going to do to me?"

The answer is almost certainly nothing at all. Police, fiscals and judges
can all exercise discretion over who to prosecute and MS sufferers do not
feature high on their list of priorities.

Paul Stewart is hoping to follow in Ivol's footsteps and win a very public
victory for all cannabis users when he opens the Purple Haze Cafe. With
this in mind, he has done his best to minimise the extent of the cafe's
illegality. It will not sell cannabis, users will have to bring their own.
Purple Haze will operate as a normal cafe in the day and then turn into a
private members'club in the evening, when cannabis will be consumed,
usually through a vaporiser which enables the drug to be taken without some
of the harmful effects associated with smoking it.

Stewart realises he faces arrest and potentially up to five years in prison
for knowingly allowing people to use cannabis on his premises, but wants
others to take up the banner if he is shut down. "We're starting a new
movement: the Scottish Cannabis Cafe movement," he said. "If the police do
decide to arrest me, we've got to make sure it's not going to stop here.
Our aim is to legalise cannabis and we're doing it for the half a million
people in Scotland who are socially excluded by the ban."

And Scotland on Sunday understands that, even if Purple Haze is closed
down, several other groups are planning to open more discreet cannabis
cafes in the next few months. One source involved in the cannabis scene
said: "If enough of these cafes open and stay open for long enough,
gradually they may become accepted as a fact of life. But we know that any
of them that become too well known will be shut down by the police.

"They have to be seen to take action, but everybody knows cannabis is not a
big problem. People who smoke don't go around robbing people and breaking
into cars to feed their habit. Smoking a joint is no worse than having a
few pints and some cigarettes."

Stewart has written to Jack McConnell asking for Purple Haze to be used to
trial cannabis cafes. But a source close to the First Minister said:
"Everybody knows that smoking and being in possession of cannabis is
illegal and Jack would hope the police would take firm and tough action."

On Thursday, he is unlikely to be disappointed.

RECLASSIFYING CANNABIS

ILLEGAL drugs are divided into three separate categories designed to show
how harmful they are. Under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, Class A includes
heroin, ecstasy and cocaine. Until Thursday, cannabis is included in class
B along with amphetamines, or speed.

When cannabis is reclassified as a category C drug, along with anabolic
steroids, Valium and the date rape drug GHB, it will still remain illegal.
However, the maximum penalty for simple possession will reduce from five
years to two years.

But, as part of the changes, the maximum sentence for dealing, trafficking
or growing the drugs will increase from five years to 14. It will also be
an offence for the manager of premises to allow cannabis to be used there,
with a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

The government has said that downgrading cannabis will help sell a "more
credible" message to young people about harder drugs. Warnings that
cannabis is as dangerous as speed, for example, are seen as
counter-productive because of the number of people who take cannabis.

The government also does not believe reclassification will lead to an
increase in the use of the drug.

The Advisory Council report on cannabis said: "The experiences in
Australia, the Netherlands and the United States are illustrative.

"In each of these countries, a reduction in the penalties for using
cannabis has not led to a significant increase in use."

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!