Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: We cheated drug testers

Merope Mills

The Guardian

Wednesday 25 Feb 2004

---
Comment



Of all the goods currently available for sale in the modern playground -
stolen trainers, alcohol, mobile phones - Tony Blair's plans to introduce
drug-testing in schools may well throw up another less palatable
black-market product. "Clean" urine, free from impurities likely to show up
in a drug analysis, looks set to be a highly sellable commodity for
enterprising students in future years.

The prime minister announced this weekend that he wants to follow the
example set by America in deterring drug use among young people through
urine tests. The Bush administration is pointing to an 11% fall in drug use
among students of 15 and upwards in the past two years. So we now have
Blair standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Bush in the war against child drug
abuse.

But Britain is not a complete stranger to the drug-testing of children. At
the sixth-form college I attended, random drug-testing has been in place
for years - the headteacher felt very strongly about the issue. Being found
out would automatically result in expulsion, even though it was an
otherwise liberal school: it provided smoking areas, and pupils could
address teachers by their first names. There, several hundred 16- to
18-year-olds swore blind they never touched the bad stuff - and, as in the
American schools, both pupils and teachers happily pointed to their exam
results to prove it.

So I, and other ex-pupils of the school, could tell Mr Blair a few home
truths about how we cheated the system. Because the reality remains that
kids who want to take drugs will dedicate hours to finding and developing a
way to make sure they can - and the threat of drugs tests is unlikely to
stop them.

In the early years of the tests being introduced at my school, a (pretty
unpleasant) urine sample racket sprung up. This involved the "clean"
students either giving or selling - depending on the relevant levels of
friendship and poverty - a sample of their own urine to the drug-takers,
who would then transfer it to the sample tube in the toilet cubicle or when
the teacher's back was turned.

This system worked for a while, but eventually the teachers caught on and
enforced a new regime: from then on, all samples had to be passed while the
teacher was watching - as if adolescence isn't bad enough, without this
royally embarrassing addition.

So the pupils had to seek new ways to get around the tests. And the
solution that they settled on is the principle reason why drug-testing
schoolchildren is a seriously misconceived idea: they decided to take
stronger drugs.

The briefest of internet searches will tell any interested teenager which
drugs stay in your system longest, and are therefore most likely to show up
in a urine test. So cannabis - which would have been most pupils'
relatively harm-free drug of choice - was off the menu for us because it
could stay in your system for up to three weeks. But class A drugs like LSD
and ecstasy had a more transient effect. Pop one on Friday and - hey
presto! - you're clean by Monday. Cocaine, crack and heroin are even less
likely to be detected, passing through the system in as little as one or
two days (depending, of course, on the quantity taken).

One of the success stories cited by the Americans involves students in
rural Autauga County in Alabama, where drug tests showed an 18% drop in
marijuana use in 2002. Sounds impressive - but there is little to prove
that the students haven't just switched their habit to something harder.

Anecdotally, this same effect has been seen in prisons, where drug tests
have been enforced for years and heroin-use, though at alarmingly high
levels, passes through the system undetected or ignored.

There also remains a serious question of just how random these drug tests
turn out to be. Leaving it up to the headteachers - as Blair proposes -
means that picking on "difficult" students is practically inevitable. At my
school, certain pupils (most notably those with poor grades who were in
danger of bringing down the school's league-table position) found
themselves "randomly" picked to take the test five or six times. Straight-A
students, meanwhile, would breeze through two years of education without
ever getting the dreaded call-up.

Many teachers have made it clear that they have no desire to take up the
burden of responsibility where police and social workers fail. Likewise,
children have enough pressures on them without feeling persecuted by their
school heads and pushed into higher-class drugs by inherently flawed tests.
Mr Blair may like to take some lessons in life before he goes proudly
declaring his solution to drug use in the young. His suggestion is likely
to make matters worse.


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!