Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Former addict to sue Yard

Alexa Baracaia And Sarah Limbrick

The Evening Standard

Wednesday 26 May 2004

---

A reformed drug addict has won legal aid to challenge police over their
decision not to arrest most cannabis users.

The former addict claims the police have no right to implement guidelines which
tell officers they should only arrest people for using the drug in extreme
circumstances.

Patrick Strahan is to sue Scotland Yard over the "softly, softly" approach to
the drug, which has been backed by Home Secretary David Blunkett and was drawn
up by England's most senior officers shortly before the drug was downgraded
from class B to class C.

He will take action against the borough commander of Lambeth, Chief
Superintendent Richard Quinn, in a bid to force him to arrest all cannabis
users.

Lambeth was the first place in the country to adopt the controversial
experiment pioneered by Commander Brian Paddick

in 2001. Under new rules based on Mr Paddick's experiment, police confiscate
cannabis from adult users and issue a warning rather than prosecute.

They only arrest people smoking near schools, repeatedly breaking the law or
flaunting the drug in front of police. More resources are thereby available to
tackle "hard" drugs.

But Mr Strahan claims the public have become the victims of a crime explosion
in Lambeth. He will argue that the use of cannabis remains inextricably linked
to crime, and that the Government is obliged to protect citizens from
lawlessness.

The claim comes after recent figures showing the number of people being caught
with cannabis in Lambeth has increased threefold since police introduced the
more lenient approach.

According to High Court papers seen by the Evening Standard, Mr Strahan will
also sue the Association of Chief Police Officers, which drew up the
guidelines.

He will use a ruling made by one of England's most famous judges to argue that
the police have no power or constitutional authority to introduce a policing
policy that "dismembers" the law.

His case will be based on a 1963 judgment by Lord Denning when police were sued
after declining to enforce the Betting Gaming and Lotteries Act 1963 because it
was unpopular. Lord Denning ruled that police had to enforce the law and detect
crimes.

Mr Strahan, who lives in Brixton, will also say that the Home Secretary's
relaxation of cannabis from a class B to class C drug earlier this year has led
to greater use among children.

Many young people believe cannabis is now legal, he says.

The 41-year-old, recently rehabilitated after a 23-year battle with drugs,
claims he moved on to harder substances after first using cannabis at the age
of 18. He now works on a project for socially excluded youngsters at risk of
offending.

The case comes after the Evening Standard revealed massive confusion over the
law on cannabis as it was downgraded to class C in January. Only days before
the reclassification, Scotland Yard chief Sir John Stevens admitted there was a
"massive amount of muddle" about the official position on the drug.

However, he defended former Lambeth commander Paddick's decision to question
the drug laws, saying police were wasting time prosecuting people for
possession of the drug only for them to receive small fines or be let off
altogether.

 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!