Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

European Union Group Urges Censorship of Pro-Cannabis Web

DRCnet.org

Drug War Chronicle #347

Friday 23 Jul 2004

---


European Union Group Urges Censorship of Pro-Cannabis Web Sites, Activists
Plot Counterattack

A European Union (EU) working group on drug policy has issued a draft
resolution identifying marijuana as European drug problem number one and
recommending, among other things, that governments move to censor or
criminalize Internet sites that provide information on cannabis cultivation
or promote its use. The European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug
Policies (http://www.encod.org), an umbrella organization of drug reform
groups that seeks to influence EU drug policy, was working this week to
formulate a response.

Meeting on July 6, the EU's Horizontal Drug Group approved the Draft
Council Resolution on Cannabis. It will now be presented to the European
Council for approval as the EU works toward completing its continental drug
strategy. Noting its concern about the rising popularity of cannabis
(marijuana), the high potency of some marijuana, possible ill health
effects, and the role of organized crime in the cannabis trade, the drug
group called for more international law enforcement cooperation against
trafficking, "alternative development" for cannabis producing regions,
demand reduction at home, no marijuana in prison, and more research.

But it was the drug group draft's 21st paragraph that was the
attention-getter. It encouraged "Member States in accordance with national
legis1ation to consider taking measures against Internet sites providing
information on cultivation and promoting the use of cannabis."

"This is nothing less then a direct attack against many organizations,
groups of people, and individuals, who are active on the Internet giving
information on cannabis cultivation and use," said Joep Oomen, ENCOD
coordinator. "If member states really adopt these measures, they could even
address them to all sites that have a cannabis leaf on it," he said. "If
Western authorities start to limit the freedom of expression of their own
citizens -- and we are talking about 25-40 million cannabis consumers in
the EU -- we can be sure that something is really going wrong."

"It is also a silly measure," he told DRCNet. "Local and national
authorities are well aware that allowing consumers to cultivate cannabis is
not leading to massive health problems. On the contrary, if you persecute
them, conditions for obtaining cannabis become harder, and all kinds of
problems start to arise which had disappeared with depenalization," he
argued. "Cultivation of cannabis for own one's consumption is depenalized
in several EU countries, such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain, and in
practice in all the EU -- no one will get into trouble for cultivating some
plants. So allowing them to cultivate but forcing them and others to keep
their mouth shut about it is a ridiculous policy."

ENCOD, which includes more than 75 different European drug reform
organizations in its membership, is plotting a response, said Oomen. "After
the European Union drug summit in Dublin in May
(http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/338/dublin.shtml), we have a foot
inside the door for the debate on the new EU drug strategy," he said. "We
were already preparing a proposal to organize a dialogue between civil
society and policymakers on the new strategy, and we may use this issue as
a good example to explain our main criticism to policymakers, namely that
they are completely out of sync with reality. We will offer them our help
to design and implement reality-based drug policies."

Still, said Oomen, there may be less here than meets the eye. "It is a
nonbinding resolution and is really meant as a symbolic measure, with which
the national and supranational policymakers hope to strengthen the
repressive trend in recent European drug policies," he explained. "It comes
just before the start of the discussion on a new EU Drug Strategy, and is
meant to push this discussion in a certain direction."

The resolution was the work of the governments of Sweden, probably Europe's
leading prohibitionist government, and Spain, but the conservative Spanish
government of Prime Minister Felipe Aznar has since been replaced by the
more reform-friendly Socialists. "It was presented in March by Sweden and
Spain in an even more repressive form, but afterwards a lot of member
states presented objections, but chose to agree on the final version as
they did not want this discussion to be mixed up with the debate on the new
EU Drug strategy that starts in September," Oomen reported.

Support for the resolution is not strong, Oomen said. According to one
government official who spoke to Oomen, "everybody, including the
governments that presented it, prefers now to forget this resolution, and
go on to the discussion on the EU Drug Strategy." This official advised
laying low, saying, "Don't paint the devil on the wall -- then it will
appear in person."

But ENCOD's membership appears disinclined to simply watch and wait.
"Perhaps everyone has forgotten about this already, but the main trend
behind this resolution will not go away if we just sit and pray, so we
definitely plan actions," said Oomen. "First we want to see how far they
allow us to go with the dialogue process, and if that is unsatisfactory, we
have other ways to put pressure on them."

Read the EU Horizontal Drug Group's Draft Council Resolution on Cannabis
online at:
http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/04/st11/st11267.en04.pdf

The full text is at:
http://www.atsipusk.info/atsipusk/draft_on_canabis_cardrogue.doc

-- END --


 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!