Cannabis Campaigners' Guide News Database result:


After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.

UK: Cannabis blamed for 'wicked' Jodi murder

John Robertson + Louise Gray

The Scotsman

Saturday 12 Feb 2005

---

CANNABIS is not a harmless recreational drug and may have played a role in
the murder of schoolgirl Jodi Jones, a High Court judge said yesterday as
he sentenced her killer to life in prison, with a minimum of 20 years.

In comments which have fed the debate over the safety of cannabis, Lord
Nimmo Smith said he believed that, in some instances, cannabis can
"seriously damage the mental processes of those who habitually consume it".

Giving Luke Mitchell the longest sentence ever passed on a youth in
Scotland, Lord Nimmo Smith added: "I think it [cannabis] may well have
contributed to your being unable to make the distinction between fantasy
and reality, which is essential for normal moral judgments, and that this,
along with other factors I have mentioned, may have meant that when you
killed Jodi you were unable to recognise what a truly wicked deed this was."

The judge's comments triggered strong reactions from those on both sides of
the cannabis debate, with the Tories calling for the reversal of the drug's
reclassification.

Lord Nimmo Smith told Mitchell, 16, he believed cannabis was one of four
factors that might have caused him to slit Jodi's throat and mutilate her
body. The other three were the teenager's interest in satanism and in the
rock star Marilyn Manson and by a character trait of a lack of emotion.

Lord Nimmo Smith said he thought Mitchell's interest in satanism was a sign
that he found "evil attractive" and thought "there might be a kind of
perverted glamour in doing something wicked".

The judge conceded that he could not fathom why Mitchell, at the age of
only 14, had committed one of the country's worst murders. "Perhaps you do
not even know yourself," he told the teenager.

Mitchell was convicted three weeks ago, by a majority verdict, of murdering
Jodi, 14, his girlfriend, on 30 June, 2003, by striking her repeatedly with
a knife in woods at Roan's Dyke path, a short-cut between their homes in
the Newbattle and Easthouses areas of Dalkeith, Midlothian.

Lord Nimmo Smith was required by law to impose a life sentence which, for
someone of Mitchell's age, is described as detention without limit of time.
Also, he had to fix a "punishment part", the period that must be served
before a murderer can even be considered for parole. In Scotland, 18 years
had been the longest punishment part imposed on a teenage killer. Adults
have received up to 30 years.

Lord Nimmo Smith said that nothing in background reports on Mitchell would
have led anyone to think he was liable to commit such a serious crime
although, with hindsight, aspects of his upbringing may have contributed.
Without specifying those, the judge moved on to several points which had
occurred to him.

"Over the past months, you have appeared before me on more than 50 separate
occasions. On none of these do I recall having detected any sign of emotion
in you.

"While this may not mean much in itself, it fits with evidence from other
sources of a striking lack of emotion on your part. It may be that a lack
of emotional response made you more readily able to inflict harm on
others," said the judge.

"Your lack of emotion may account for the callous charade in which you
pretended to help search for Jodi, and inflicted on members of her family
the pain of the discovery of her body.

"I do not think that your interest in satanism can be ignored as mere
adolescent rebellion. I think it is a sign that you found evil attractive
and that you thought there might be a kind of perverted glamour in doing
something wicked.

"I remain of the view that this is one of the worst cases of murder of a
single victim to have come before this court in many years. If you were
older, I would have no difficulty in deciding that the seriousness of the
offence merited the imposition of a punishment part among the longest that
there have been. It is only your age that has led me to decide that a
lesser period will be appropriate ... 20 years."

The defence counsel, Donald Findlay, QC, said that, in spite of the jury's
guilty verdict, Mitchell continued to plead his innocence, and an appeal
would be sought. "As long as that young man maintains to me he did not kill
Jodi, the fight to clear his name will go on," Mr Findlay said. He had
submitted that the Luke Mitchell he knew was not the Luke Mitchell who, the
jury said, committed this awful crime.

"He is intelligent and I have never found him other than courteous and
respectful ... a polite, charming and actually quite entertaining young
lad," Mr Findlay said.

Last night, politicians and drugs campaigners said Lord Nimmo Smith's
warning on cannabis should be heeded.

Annabel Goldie, the Tory justice spokeswoman, demanded a reversal of the
reclassification.

She said: "Maybe all those who have claimed that cannabis was a harmless
drug will sit up and take notice of Lord Nimmo Smith. Maybe, too, the
Labour government will think again about the ridiculous reclassification of
cannabis. The Tories have pledged to restore it as a class B drug should we
win the general election."

Alistair Ramsay, director of Scotland Against Drugs, said the judge's
comments highlighted the danger. "It has been known for some time that the
strength of cannabis available on the streets can produce paranoia which
will often have unfortunate consequences," he said.

But John Arthur, the manager at the drug abuse support centre Crew 2000,
said adults should not "demonise" cannabis.

He pointed out the drug was used by around three million people in the UK
with relatively few harmful consequences, while alcohol consumption has
risen four-fold, causing more violence on the streets.

The Home Office insisted an information campaign, which coincided with the
reclassification of cannabis, informed the public about the changes to the
law. A spokesman said: "In particular, it focused on ensuring that young
people are aware that cannabis will remain illegal and that it is harmful."




 

 

 

After you have finished reading this article you can click here to go back.




This page was created by the Cannabis Campaigners' Guide.
Feel free to link to this page!